今篇主日信息，屬於教會內部傳閱內容，
只提供主日有提及的網上資料，作為參考。
以下影片中，在一個約四五十人的聚會裡，主持人問了兩個問題。
第一個問題︰
「有沒有認識的人，因感染新冠病毒而死？有的話請站立。」
結果沒有任何人站立。
第二個問題︰
「有沒有認識的人，因接種新冠疫苗的副作用而死？有的話請站立。」
結果幾乎全場站立。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/hnuL9BE9yX8HD6we/?mibextid=zWBbVw
Please stand up if you know of someone who died just of Covid.
如果你知道有人僅僅因為新冠而死亡，請站起來。
Of nothing else, just of Covid.
並非任何其他原因，僅僅因為新冠而死。
Please stand up if you know of someone who died just of the Covid virus.
如果你知道有人純粹死於新冠病毒，請站起來。
Okay.
好的。
Can you please stand up if you know of anyone
who has been injured or died by the jab.
如果你知道有人因為疫苗接種而受傷或死亡，請站起來。
Welcome to the war.
歡迎加入這場戰爭。
----------------------
此外，在 2024 年 2 月 15 日，
美國眾議院舉行的「疫苗安全系統聽證會」上，
眾議員 Michael Cloud，質詢了美國食品藥物管理局（FDA）、
疾病管制署（CDC）和衛生資源和服務局（HRSA）的代表，
詢問新冠疫苗能否防止感染和傳播新冠病毒。
FDA 代表無可奈何地回答，新冠疫苗既不能防止感染，
也不能防止傳播。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/NgnGMWKd1Ptscd21/?mibextid=zWBbVw
Can you receive it or can you transmit it after receiving the Covid-19 vaccines?
接種新冠疫苗後，你還有可能感染或傳播病毒嗎？
I think having worked at CDC for 30 years and seeing the benefits of vaccine.
我想，在 CDC 工作了 30 年，看到了疫苗的好處後，
You know, we have to make the best recommendation.
你知道，我們必須做出最佳建議。
Can you transmit it or can you receive it after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine?
接種新冠疫苗後，你還有可能感染或傳播病毒嗎？
We need to make the best recommendations.
我們需要做出最佳建議。
That's a yes or no question, it's very simple.
這是個是或否的問題，非常簡單。
Commander Grimes, can you receive?
格萊姆斯指揮官，還有可能感染嗎？
I think we, uh, we, we make the best recommendations for the public as we can.
我想，嗯，我們盡可能為公眾提供最佳建議。
Can you still get Covid after getting the Covid-19 vaccine?
接種新冠疫苗後，你還有可能感染新冠嗎？
Yes.
是的。
Yes, okay.
是的，好的。
That's correct.
那是正確的。
Does it prevent you from transmitting it?
接種疫苗能防止你傳播病毒嗎？
Although it may, there's, there's data that shows that earlier in the pandemic,
there was some reduction in transmission.
雖然有可能⋯⋯ 有數據顯示在疫情早期，傳播有所減少。
The data on that are very challenging to, um, uh, to pin down,
but it does not absolutely prevent transmission.
這方面的數據非常難以確定，但它無法完全阻止傳播。
It does not prevent transmission, thank you very much.
它不能阻止傳播，謝謝你！
----------------------
以下影片，由畢業於英國醫學院、
並接受心臟病學專業訓練的英國心臟病學家，
Dr. Aseem Malhotra 現身說法。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/vAXoXWypNq3XcQii/?mibextid=zWBbVw
And this is really most disturbing.
這真是最令人不安的事情。
In 2021, there was a 25 percent increase in heart attacks and/or cardiac arrests in people agedbetween 16 and 39.
2021 年，16 歲至 39 歲人群心臟病發作及／或心臟驟停率上升了25%。
Which was associated with the Covid vaccine but not associated with Covid.
這與新冠疫苗有關，卻與新冠本身無關。
----------------------
此外，一位美國海軍人員曾拍攝影片，指出在 2022 年，
即全球接種新冠疫苗後兩年，統計數據顯示，
單單在直升機和固定翼飛行員中，
高血壓疾病，增加 36%；
缺血性心臟病，增加 69%；
肺源性心臟病，增加 62%；
心臟衰竭，增加 973%；。
其他類型的心臟病，增加 63%；
心肌病變，增加 152%。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/reel/2764876900343257
In July, Undersecretary Cisneros acknowledged the DMED data.
在 7 月，副部長 Cisneros 承認了國防醫學流行病數據庫的數據，
The database working properly, and also acknowledged things such as myocarditis rising151percent.
數據庫運作正常，同時也承認了心肌炎上升 151%等事項，
So what I did, I went in today, and I'm doing the same thing, five year average.
而我今天做了同樣的分析，取 5 年平均值，
However, I'm comparing it to 2022.
不過我會與 2022 年的數據進行對比。
And I only am using fixed wing pilots and helicopter pilots.
並且我只會使用定翼機和直升機飛行員的數據。
Active duty.
現役。
So, we got hypertensive disease, 36 percent.
結果顯示高血壓疾病，增加 36%；
Ischemic heart disease, 69 percent.
缺血性心臟病，增加 69%；
Pulmonary heart disease, 62 percent.
肺源性心臟病，增加 62%；
Heart failure, 973 percent.
心臟衰竭，增加 973%；
Other forms of heart disease, 63 percent.
其他類型的心臟病，增加 63%；
Cardiomyopathy, 152 percent.
心肌病變，增加 152%。
----------------------
以下影片，是 2024 年 5 月 6 日，
對倫敦大學聖喬治學院醫學院腫瘤學教授 Angus Dalgleish 的訪問。
他提到許多已康復的癌症病人，在接種新冠疫苗加強劑後，
癌症在三周至三個月內復發。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/s5ZVZbuUwDLc9BdA/?mibextid=zWBbVw
Can you explain in simple terms what it is that you are seeing
你能簡單解釋一下，你觀察到什麼情況，
that has got the alarm bells ringing?
讓你意識到警鐘已被敲響了？
Well, the first thing I saw doing a regular melanoma clinic.
多年來，我一直定期在黑色素瘤診所應診，
That I had been doing for years was that I was starting to see people who were stable.
最近我開始注意到一些原本病情穩定的病人，
That we'd been doing immunotherapy for over 20 years.
這些病人接受免疫治療已超過 20 年。
And I was starting to see people who'd been stable for 5, 10, even 20 years relapse.
病情穩定期長達 5 年、10 年，甚至 20 年。
Really unusually, they're very fit and healthy.
現在卻開始復發，這很不尋常，因為他們都非常健康。
And I've occasionally seen this, when somebody gets very depressed.
我偶爾會看到類似情況，例如當病人出現嚴重抑鬱。
They get knocked back, a bereavement, a divorce, a bankruptcy for months.
可能是因為喪親、離婚或破產等打擊。
We know this depression is associated with immune suppression.
導致數個月的情緒低落，我們知道抑鬱症與免疫力下降有關。
So, I have seen that two or three times.
我見過幾次這種情況，
And I looked for this in these patients and there was absolutely no evidence.
我觀察了這些復發的病人，但沒有證據顯示情緒問題，
They were all perfectly happy.
他們的心情都極之愉快。
So, I basically said, "What have they all got in common?"
於是我問自己：「他們有什麼共通點？」
And they'd all got in common was they'd had the first booster vaccine,
it was around this time.
共通點是，他們都在近期接種了第一劑新冠疫苗加強劑。
And I was able to show that they'd had it.
我確認了他們接種加強劑後，
Then the relapse started between about three weeks
and three months after the booster vaccine.
大約在 3 星期至 3 個月內開始復發，
So, I thought this was, this is an association.
所以我認為兩者之間存在關聯。
It doesn't mean to say it's causal, I mean, I'm the first to say that.
不代表一定存有因果關係，我要先強調這一點。
But when you see an association.
但如果你觀察到這種關聯，
And that it might be actually inducing it.
而且懷疑是加強劑誘發了復發。
You have to first of all ask why.
首先，你必須從科學角度思考，
Scientifically is there a rationale for this?
當中有沒有合理的機制？
And two, is there anything else, is it just a coincidence?
第二，有沒有其他可能性，會不會只是巧合？
Well, the thing that alarmed me was that.
嗯，讓我感到擔憂的是，
I've done a lot of research on vaccines in my time.
我多年來對疫苗做了很多研究，
And I immediately remembered the model where one vaccine's good.
我立刻想起有關疫苗的研究模型，接種第一劑效果良好。
Two might help if the first one didn't react properly.
如果第一劑反應不佳，第二劑可能有助提升保護力，
But the third actually causes more inflammation than good.
但第三劑反而會引起過度發炎，弊大於利。
And actually detracts from the first two.
甚至抵消前兩劑的作用，
And the fourth, it's even worse.
第四劑的情況更糟。
And I suddenly thought, "Is this what I'm seeing here?"
我突然想到：「這會不會就是我現在觀察到的情況呢？」
So, we looked at the patients who'd been given their booster vaccine.
於是我們研究了那些接種了加強劑的病人，
There's a lot of research going on.
目前有很多研究正在進行。
And they were all just focused on the antibodies.
但這些研究都只關注抗體水平，
I mean, the rationale for giving this booster vaccine.
我的意思是，他們接種加強劑的理由是，
Was the antibodies from the first two are starting to wane, they need a boost.
前兩劑產生的抗體水平開始下降，需要提升，
That was totally inane thinking.
這種想法完全荒謬。
Because the antibodies will always wane after an infection, after a vaccine.
因為抗體水平本身在感染後或接種疫苗後就會下降，
And then they will settle primed for when you do come across the virus.
然後它們會進入準備狀態，一旦再次遇到病毒，
They're primed to rise up against it.
就能迅速增生來對抗病毒，
You don't need to give it a big boost.
根本不需要額外的加強劑。
And the other thing that was clear.
另外一點很明顯，
They were boosting initially with exactly the same virus
that they were attacking in the first place.
加強劑所針對的，是最初期的病毒株，
Which had left the planet over a year ago, 18 months ago.
但那種病毒株在 1 年多前，也就是 18 個月前已消失了。
And we were now dealing with a totally different variant, the Omicron.
而我們要應對的是完全不同的變異株 Omicron。
Which I actually personally think was the best vaccine we ever had.
我個人認為，它本身就是最有效的疫苗，
Because it was airborne and very non-toxic.
因為它能夠經空氣傳播，但毒性很低。
What is it that, let's say that it's the booster.
假設問題的確出在加強劑上，
Whatever was injected in the booster.
不論加強劑中注射了什麼成分，
What is it that it does to the body or to the immune system.
它究竟對人體或免疫系統做了什麼，
That would make that person more susceptible to the cancer
that had otherwise been being held in abeyance?
才會讓原本受到控制的癌症復發呢？
Well, that's quite right.
嗯，你說得對。
The immune system does hold the cancer in abeyance.
免疫系統的確可以抑制癌症，
We now know that very, very well.
現時我們已非常清楚這一點。
And we have known that when severe immune suppression is induced
我們也知道，當免疫系統受到嚴重抑制。
by some other source like HIV.
例如感染 HIV 病毒時，
Cancers appear which would not normally have appeared.
一些原本不會出現的癌症就會出現。
So, what's happened with this booster?
那麼，接種加強劑後發生了什麼事？
I mean, it's a powerful booster designed to
我的意思是，它是一種強效的加強劑，
induce as many antibodies as possibly can.
目的是盡可能誘發更多的抗體。
And the immune system has only got limited resources.
但免疫系統的資源是有限的，
And it remains in an equilibrium balance.
必須維持自身在平衡狀態。
So, you're suddenly using an enormous amount of these resources to make antibodies.
而你卻突然動用大量資源來製造抗體，
To throw at the virus that's not there and never will be.
去對抗一種已經不存，並且永遠不會再出現的病毒。
And we predicted that if there was a successful coronavirus vaccine.
我們曾經預測，即使研發出一種成功的冠狀病毒疫苗，
It would only be useful the once.
它的效用也只有一次。
Because you get this thing called “immunological imprinting” or “antigenic sin”.
因為會出現一種稱為「免疫印記」或「抗原原罪」的現象。
So, even if you do put in a new variant.
即使你使用新變種的疫苗，
The immune system will only see the response to the first virus and the first vaccine.
免疫系統也只會啟動對第一種病毒或第一劑疫苗的反應。
So, the scenario is quite pointless.
所以，重複接種疫苗根本沒有意義，
Except by using all these resources, you actually take away from the T cells.
反而因為資源耗盡，消耗了 T 細胞。
And it's the T cells controlling the cancer.
而 T 細胞才是抑制癌症的關鍵，
And then I was, when I actually speculated this might be happening.
當我推測出這種情況後，
I asked the people in the lab to look at it.
我請實驗室人員進行研究。
and lo and behold, another group published that.
令人驚訝的是，另一個團隊發表了研究，
Cancer patients who'd received the booster had T cell exhaustion.
證實了接種加強劑的癌症病人，出現「T 細胞耗竭」的情況，
I mean, they couldn't have put it better.
他們的描述非常貼切，
And the T cells are policing.
T 細胞就像警察一樣，
They're looking for cancer cells to arrest and detain.
不斷巡邏、搜尋癌細胞，一旦發現就逮捕、清除。
It's a very good way of putting it.
這個比喻很恰當，
And they probably do it on a daily basis.
它們可能每天都在執行任務，
I mean, we have abnormal cells rise every day.
我們體內每天都有細胞發生異變。
There's millions and millions.
數量非常龐大，
And it's very well controlled.
但都受到嚴密控制。
And we know this, that patients who've had very bad cancer.
我們知道，對於患有嚴重癌症的病人，
We can give them the new immunotherapies now
我們可以利用新的免疫療法，
to boost their T cell responses.
來增強他們體內 T 細胞的反應。
And they can get complete responses.
讓他們的 T 細胞反應良好，
And be under control for years.
病情能夠以年計的受控。
And so this is what was happening with the booster vaccine,
it was perturbing this wonderful equilibrium of control.
而加強劑恰恰擾亂了這種微妙的免疫平衡。
And basically interrupting all the resources,
and it led to a depression of the T cell response.
基本上干擾了資源運用，導致T細胞反應受抑制。
Now, I thought that was the most likely explanation.
我認為這就是最合理的解釋，
But I was amazed at how bad
it was in some patients.
但有些病人的情況，比我想像中嚴重得多。
As I said, they used T cell exhaustion,
not T cell suppression.
正如我所說，他們用的字眼是T細胞耗竭，
而不是T細胞受抑制。But exhaustion,
that they'd just been stimulated to the point.
耗竭是指T細胞遭受過度刺激，
Where they were no longer able to do their job.
而完全失去原有的功能。
And then another paper came out showing
that after the booster.然後，
另一項研究顯示，在接種加強劑後，
Not after the first and second.
不是在接種第一劑和第二劑後，
The first and second induce what we call
“immunoglobulin subtypes”.
第一劑和第二劑會引發所謂的「免疫球蛋白亞型」，
Wecall these one and three,
and these make neutralizing antibodies.
我們稱這些亞型為1類和3類，它們會產生中和抗體。
But after the booster,
many people now have reported
但在接種加強劑後，許多研究報告指出，
that the subtype switches to four.
亞型會轉換成第4類。
Now, what this means, instead of
attacking a virus with a neutralizing killing.
這意味著，它由原本藉中和抗體方式殺滅病毒，
They switch off to a tolerizing one.
演變成免疫耐受。
And IgG4 is exactly the antibody response you want.
免疫球蛋白G4正是器官移植病人所需的抗體反應，
If you have a kidney transplant or a liver transplant.
例如腎臟或肝臟移植，
You want to tolerize the antibodies so they don't go and attack.
你希望產生免疫耐受，以避免自身抗體。
The new kidney or the renal.
攻擊移植的器官，
So, all of a sudden, this starts falling into place.
所以突然間，一切都豁然開朗。
MyGod, we're switching off the policeman.
我的天啊！我們不只暫停了警察的職務，
and then we're tolerizing.
還讓免疫系統對癌細胞產生耐受性。
And so no wonder that cancer's able to escape.
難怪癌症會復發，
But subsequently, we found many other disturbing reasons why.
但後來，我們還發現許多令人擔憂的因素。
At the very least, and my point is being that
the fact that we have a scientific explanation for this.
最起碼，我意思是，我們對這個現象已經有科學解釋。
The fact that we are seeing this should be a red flag.
我們觀察到的情況應被視為警號，
And the MHRAshould stop all the boosters.
英國藥物及保健產品管理局應該停止所有加強劑的接種。
I mean, they've reduced it for people under 75.
雖然他們已將接種年齡收窄至75歲以下，
But if you're at risk, you can still get it.
但高風險人士仍然可以接種，
You can buy it at Boots, so there was an announcement.
你仍然可以在博姿藥妝店買到，官方也發佈了公告。
I mean, all this is absolutely nonsense.
我認為，對於一種早已消失的病毒，
For a virus that has long since gone.
這些做法完全是荒謬的。
----------------------
以下，是畢業於加拿大多倫多大學和蒙特婁麥基爾大學醫學院，
放射治療和腫瘤學專家WilliamMakis的現身說法。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/ke1juWi9x1pYGmmJ/?mibextid=zWBbVw
What we are seeing since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines is a completely different picture.
自從新冠疫苗推出以來，我們看到的是截然不同的景象。
In terms of who's presenting with these cancers,
what these cancers are behaving like.
所指的是患上癌症的人群、以及癌症的表現形式。
And I'll give you a couple of very quick examples.
我將給你幾個非常簡單的例子，
Um, weare seeing teenage girls or girls
in their 20s presenting with stage 4 breast cancer.
我們看到10多歲或20多歲的女孩患上第4期乳腺癌。
And they have no family history,
她們並沒有家族病史，
That is something, and they've been Covid-vaccinated.
這很不尋常，她們之所以接種了新冠疫苗。
Because they needed to take the shots
to continue attending university or college
是因為她們需要打針，為了繼續上大學或學院。
or maybe they just got out of university and they got a job.
或者她們剛從大學畢業，找到工作。
And that like a teacher and then
they were mandated to take those vaccines.
比如當老師，然後被要求接種疫苗，
Or maybe they were a nurse and they were mandated
in the health profession to take the Covid-19 vaccines.
又或者她們是護士，在醫療行業被強制接種新冠疫苗。
Wehave never seen so many young women
presenting with stage 4 cancers.
我們從未見過，這麼多年輕女性出現第4期癌症。
And the only thing that they have in common.
而她們唯一的共通點。
Is there's no genetic anomalies, there's no family history.
就是她們並沒有基因異常，沒有家族病史，
They all were forced to take the Covid-19 vaccines,
or they took them willingly, but they've had the shots.
她們都被迫或自願接種了新冠疫苗，都打了針，
That is the only commonality.
這是唯一的共通點。
Same thing with colon cancer,
young people presenting in their 20s and 30s.
結腸癌也一樣，20多歲和30多歲的年輕患者，
Wehave never seen so many stage 4 presentations
of colon cancer in young people.
我們從未在年輕人中，看到如此多的第4期結腸癌病例。
Again, the only thing they have in common is that.
同樣，他們唯一的共通點是，
They've taken Covid-19 vaccines
since the vaccines rolled out in 2021.
自2021年新冠疫苗推出以來，他們都接種了。
So, we have a completely different pattern
of cancers that are presenting.
同時，我們看到一種完全不同的癌症模式正在呈現，
They grow extremely rapidly.
它們生長速度極快，
They metastasize very quickly, and they're resistant.
轉移非常迅速，而且有抗藥性
In many cases, they are completely resistant
to conventional chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
在許多情況下，它們對傳統化療或放療完全有抗藥性。
That is also something that we simply haven't seen before.
這也是我們以前從未見過的現象。
----------------------
在另一段訪問影片中，WilliamMakis更透露，
大規模接種新冠疫苗後，
出現了一種他稱為「TurboCancer」渦輪癌症的現象，
癌症如同安裝了渦輪增壓引擎的跑車一樣，突然加速。
任何人接種了新冠疫苗，都可能罹患渦輪癌症，
一出現就是第四期，並可能在數周甚至數天內死亡。
甚至有十多歲的年輕人，原本健康，卻突然不適入院，
發現已患上末期血癌，並於當天死亡。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/zmjgiUQM5Dxm4TLu/?mibextid=zWBbVw
Look, these turbo cancers,
they're happening in pregnant women.
看，渦輪癌症正出現在孕婦身上，
They're happening in young kids,
as I said, as young as 12 years old.
也出現在兒童身上，如我所說，甚至年僅12歲的孩子。
But high school kids are coming down with these cancers.
高中生也正患上這些癌症，
The turbo cancers, I'm seeing lymphomas,
I'm seeing brain cancers, stage 4 brain cancers
我看到的渦輪癌症包括淋巴瘤、腦癌、第4期腦癌。
and then breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers.
以及乳癌、結腸癌、肺癌。
The Leukemias that are showing up
in the Covid-vaccinated individuals.
在接種新冠疫苗的人群中，還出現了白血病。
They can kill in a matter of days or even hours.
幾天甚至幾小時內足以致命，
I've reported several cases where young kids,
13 years old, 16 years old, they feel unwell.
我曾報告過數個案例，其中13歲、16歲的青少年感到不適。
They go to emergency, and the doctors discover
that they have leukemia, and then they die a few hours later.
去急診室後，醫生發現他們患上白血病，
幾小時後就不幸死亡。
These are tragic stories, and oncologists are,
they're not talking about it.
這些都是悲劇，但腫瘤科醫生卻對此保持沉默。
Uh, you know, there's only Professor Dalgleish,
in St George's, University in London, United Kingdom,
who's sounding the alarm.
你知道，
只有英國倫敦大學聖喬治分校的達格利什教授在發出警告。
And he has seen his patients, who were stable,
cancer-stable cancer patients.
他的一些病情穩定的癌症病人，
Whotook a Covid booster shot and suddenly,
you know, their cancer is growing out of control.
在接種新冠疫苗加強劑後，癌症突然失控。
And so he's sounding the alarm,
因此他發出了警告，
But, you know, doctors are being persecuted
for speaking up and for causing vaccine hesitancy.
但你知道，有醫生因為說出真相和引起疫苗猶豫而受迫害。
----------------------
以下影片，是Dr.PeterMcCullough的現身說法。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/j2KzcXNFFasqRsAx/?mibextid=zWBbVw
What we're seeing, I'm convinced, is the tip of the iceberg.
我深信，我們目前所見的僅是冰山一角，
The biggest published series of myocarditis before the pandemic.
在疫情之前，幾十年累積的數據中，
Across decades and decades of accumulating data, was 500 cases.
已發表的最大系列心肌炎病例為500例，
In my practice before the pandemic.
在疫情前的執業生涯中，
I had only seen two cases of myocarditis,
and one of them was fatal.
我只遇過兩例心肌炎病例，其中一例是致命的。
Nowthere are papers laying it
all in the British Medical Journal Open.
現在有論文將這一切都發表在《英國醫學雜誌》公開版上，
18,000 cases in a single manuscript.
單篇手稿中有18,000個病例，
I am seeing dozens and dozens of cases.
我看到了幾十個又幾十個病例。
In my practice, I have well more than
several hundred cases with myocarditis
在我的執業中，我處理的心肌炎病例遠超數百個，
That is how common it is.
它就是如此普遍程度。
And it's sad to say, I don't have a chance
to see all of those who've died of a cardiac arrest.
遺憾的是，我沒有機會看到所有因心臟驟停而死亡的人。
In the Hulscher paper that I've quoted.
在我引用的Hulscher論文中，
The cause of sudden adult death syndrome
is very likely to be vaccine-induced myocarditis.
成人猝死綜合症的原因，很可能是疫苗引發的心肌炎。
And it may be so sufficiently subtle.
而且可能非常微妙，
It couldn't be detected on an MRI, even if we got one.
即使磁振造影（MRI）也無法檢測到。
But I have seen cases evolve and present now.
但我看到病例已經演變並出現，
Three years after the vaccine, with documented cardiac arrests,
three years after vaccination.
在接種疫苗3年後，有不同心臟驟停病例發生並記錄在案。
----------------------
此外，全球人壽保險業界發現，
自2021年，即全球開始接種新冠疫苗後，
18-49 歲年齡層的猝死案例大幅增加，且原因不明。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/a8pHVi3bS3WNCwQq/?mibextid=zWBbVw
Sudden death among healthy
working age people worldwide is skyrocketing.
全球健康工作年齡人群中的猝死人數正急劇上升，
Here inAmerica, it was up 40 percent
during the third and fourth quarters of 2021.
在美國，2021年第3和第4季度期間，這一數字上升了40%，
Our next guest contends a 10 percent
jump would have been a one-in-200 year event.
我們的下一位嘉賓認為，
10%的增長本應是200年一遇的事件，
But this was 40 percent.而如今卻是40%。
Life insurance companies have reported.
人壽保險公司報告稱，
An overwhelming and unexplainable
increase in all-cause deaths among 18 to 49 year olds.
18 至49歲人群的全因死亡數字，
出現驚人且無法解釋的飆升。
Along with that, there's also been an increase
in certain medical diagnosis
.同時，某些疾病的診斷也有所增加，
Such as miscarriages, in Bell's Palsy.
例如流產和貝爾氏麻痺症，
Have you noticed how so many young people
are dying of heart attacks.
你是否注意到近期有許多青年人死於心臟病發作？
I know I've spoken about this in the past and repeatedly,
but there's a need to talk more about this.
我過去曾多次提及此事，但有必要再深入探討，
And try and understand why heart attacks
are suddenly claiming young lives.
嘗試理解為什麼心臟病發作，突然奪走眾多年輕生命。
The pandemic has helped fuel a rise in the number
of fatal cardiac arrests across the country,
according to a new report.
一份最新報告指出，疫情加劇了全國致命性心臟驟停案例。
Let's bring in Today's Aislin Kriukelis in Brisbane for us.
讓我們連線Today駐布里斯班記者
AislinKriukelis. MorningAislin, what are health experts saying?
Aislin，早安，衛生專家怎麼說？
Jane, they say the data is concerning.
Jane，他們表示數據令人擔憂，
And that's because it shows within
the first eight months of 2022.
數據顯示，在2022年首8個月裡，
More than 10,200Australians died
due to heart-related disease, and that number
is considered 17 percent higher than
what would be considered normal.
超過10,200名澳洲人死於心臟相關疾病，
比正常水平高出17%。
The CDCfinding 16 to 24 year olds who
received the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.
疾控中心發現，接種輝瑞或莫德納疫苗的16至24歲人群中，
Have experienced higher than normal cases of
myocarditis and inflammation of the heart muscle.
心肌炎和心肌炎症病例高於正常水平，
Myocarditis symptoms can include fever
and fatigue, shortness of breath, and chest pain
心肌炎的症狀包括發燒、疲勞、呼吸急促和胸痛。
The CDCsaid .疾控中心表示，The higher rate of
cases occurred, especially among young men
following their second dose of an mRNAvaccine.
年輕男性在接種第2劑mRNA疫苗後，心肌炎發病率更高。
So, this has basically accelerated as the vaccine rollout
or the number of boosters.
所以，這基本上是隨著疫苗或加強劑的推出而加劇。
So, how do you understand this?
你怎麼理解這一點？Yeah.是的。
Myocarditis itself, yeah, absolutely.
心肌炎本身，確實如此，
Um, I think all cardiovascular conditions
have got worse because of the vaccine.
我認為所有的心血管疾病都因為疫苗而惡化。
And anything and everything that can go wrong with the heart.
由於這些mRNA疫苗，
Has gone wrong with the heart as a result of these mRNAvaccines.
心臟可能出現的所有問題，都已經出現了。
There's no doubt about it.
這是毫無疑問的，
----------------------
創傷和急症醫生KellyVictory，畢業於美國杜克大學，
並於北卡羅來納大學取得醫生資格。
在以下訪問中，她指出自2021年全球大規模接種新冠疫苗後，
世界各地的猝死案例，呈幾何級數上升。
所有矛頭都指向同一個元兇，並非新冠病毒，
諷刺地，正是藥廠大力推行的新冠疫苗。
----------------------
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/JbTfiMHwnBRa8EWS/?mibextid=zWBbVw
The media is waking up to the fact that
傳媒終於醒覺，
excess deaths are a thing and have been.
「超額死亡」確實存在，而且一直在發生，
Since the pandemic and specifically the vaccine rollout.
由疫情大流行開始，尤其是自疫苗推出以來。
Wayto catch up after years of lacking curiosity on the matter.
漠視情況多年後，終於開始追趕了。
Nowthe headline from The Telegraph today.
今天《每日電訊報》的新聞標題是，
The first corporate media headline of its kind.
這是首次有主流媒體報導。
Despite, of course, excess deaths happening
since 2020 at least.
雖然超額死亡至少從2020年就開始發生，
Well, someone who was warning
about this all along is Dr. Kelly Victory.
有人一直以來為此發出警告，她就是KellyVictory博士。
She joins us today and is a first-time guest on Redacted.
她今天來到，首次成為本節目Redacted（塗黑刪節）的嘉賓。
Thank you so much for joining us.
十分感謝你參與我們的節目。
Thanks very much for having me.
非常感謝你邀請我。
So, okay, let's go over this study because the media is like.
好的，讓我們來看看這項研究，因為媒體的態度似乎是，
Oh, what's this? Excess deaths?
哦，「超額死亡」是甚麼？
Despite having no curiosity about it.
雖然他們對此漠不關心，
So why is this a ground breaking study?
那麼，這項研究為何如此具有突破性？
Well, as you pointed out, I and others have been
bringing this to light now for almost three years.
正如你所說，我和其他人已經將這個問題公之於眾近3年了。
The fact that the mainstream media is just waking up,
I guess is to be expected.
主流媒體才剛醒覺，我想這是意料中事。
The reality is that we've had the data
and the data are irrefutable.
事實是，這些數據是我們一直掌握，而且是無可辯駁的，
We've seen a significant uptick in all-cause mortality in pretty
much every civilized country you know around the globe.
全球幾乎所有發達國家，全因死亡數字都有顯著上升，
Wehave data going back to, you know, 2020.
我們的數據可追溯到2020年。
And interestingly the excess deaths did not begin then.
值得注意的是，超額死亡並不是從那時開始，
This most recent study from Germany showed that.
德國最近的一項研究顯示，
They looked at excess deaths beginning meaning.
他們研究了超額死亡的開始時間，這意味著，
If you look at deaths from all causes.
當查看各種死因，
And say how many deaths would we normally expect in a year.
看看在一年內，預期通常會有多少人死亡，
And they compared the deaths in 2020 to that.
然後將 2020 年的死亡人數與之比較。
And they said there really the deaths from
all causes were pretty much on par in 2020.
他們表示，實際上各種原因導致死亡的人數都在預期的水平。
Despite the fact that we were in the very serious
Delta wave of Covid.
雖然我們當時面對非常嚴重的新冠 Delta 疫情中，
There wasn't a significant increase in Osby in deaths.
死亡人數並沒有顯著增加。
Somewhere around 4,000 increased deaths in
Germany were noted in 2020.
2020 年，德國增加了約 4,000 宗死亡個案，
That changed drastically in 2021 and
specifically after April of 2021.
情況在 2021 年劇烈變化，尤其是 2021 年 4 月之後，
They saw a two-standard-deviation increase
in deaths in Germany beginning in April of 2021.
從 2021 年 4 月開始，德國的死亡人數增加了兩個標準差。
And stunningly a four-standard-deviation
increase in deaths in 2022.
而在 2022 年，死亡人數增加達 4 個標準差，令人震驚。
This is consistent with what life insurance
companies in the United States started
to report inJanuary of 2022.
美國壽險公司在 2022 年 1 月開始也有報告，情況一致，
They saw a 40 percent increase in deaths
in the age group where you wouldn't normallyexpect them.
在死亡率本應很低的那個年齡組別中，上升了 40%，
Meaning those people who are employed,
people between the ages of 19 and say 49.
即那些就業人士，19 歲到 49 歲的人。
That increase has not been accounted for
by any of the organizations.
對此，任何專責的組織都沒有解釋，
That are mandated, whose job it is to look into this, namely the CDC.
即負責調查此事的組織，美國疾病控制與預防中心。
Why have they not investigated this?
為何他們不就此展開調查？
If people want to speculate that it's something other than.
若有人推斷這是有另有原因，
In my mind the most obvious thing, what happened in April 21.
而不是我心目中最明顯的原因，即 2021 年 4 月的那件事。
Let's see, it was the mass rollout of the mRNA vaccines.
讓我們回顧一下，當時大規模地推出 mRNA 疫苗。
If someone wants to suggest that there is another reason.
若有人想指出另有原因。
Great, let's have that discussion.
好啊，就讓我們來討論一下。
But we are obligated as scientists to look into this.
但作為科學家，我們有義務探討這個問題，
And to come up with plausible explanations.
並提出合理的解釋。
For why we have seen this massive increase in all-cause mortality.
解釋為何全因死亡率會大幅上升。
Now, one thing that The Telegraph does report is.
有一點是《每日電訊報》有報導的，
Oh, well, it could be the vaccine rollout.
就是，好吧，這可能是與疫苗推行有關。
Because the times correlate the months that you say.
因為時間與你提到的月份吻合，
But also it could be pandemic-related measures,
lockdown measures and things like that.
但也可能是由於疫情相關的措施，例如封城措施等。
So, they are still leaving it open for other causes.
他們仍然沒有排除其他成因，
So, what do you think of that?
你怎麼看這個說法？
Well, there's no question that we saw an increase
in harm and damage to people.
毫無疑問，民眾遭受了更多的傷害和損失。
Because of the unnecessary and preposterous
mitigation schemes like the lockdown.
皆因那些不必要和荒謬的緩解措施，例如封城。
UNICEF has calculated that.
聯合國兒童基金會估計，
Somewhere in the range of possibly 250,000
a quarter of a million children may have starvedto death globally.
全球可能有大約 25 萬兒童死於飢餓，
As a result of the lockdown and the impact on the food supply,
the food chain.
歸咎於封城措施及其對食物供應和食物鏈的影響。
So, yes, then there were people who were clearly
driven to substance abuse and may havedied from that.
是的，也有些人顯然承受不住而濫用藥物，甚至喪命。
There are people who died from lack of medical care
for underlying conditions like diabetesand heart disease.
還有些人因缺乏醫療照顧，死於潛在疾病如糖尿病和心臟病等。
But that can't possibly explain the totality of
a four-standard-deviation increase.
但這不可能完全解釋到，為何升幅達 4 個標準差。
Furthermore, why did we not start seeing
that increase until after April of 2021?
再者，為何直到 2021 年 4 月之後，升幅才開始出現？
Those mitigation schemes were put in place
beginning in March of 2020.
自 2020 年 3 月，那些緩解措施開始實施，
So, if the issue was the measures like masking,
social distancing, lockdowns, whatever else.
若問題出在戴口罩、保持社交距離、封城等措施上。
We would have expected to see the increase
in deaths beginning far sooner than April of 2021.
那麼，死亡率理應在 2021 年 4 月更早之前便上升了。
Good point, good point.
很有道理。
So, there's a chart here that gives a predicted
linear trend of excess deaths.
這裡有一個圖表，是超額死亡的線性趨勢估算，
Which is usually pretty steady state.
通常是相當穩定的水平，
The governments and researchers and
demographers expect that,
you know, deaths will beat about a certain rate.
政府、研究員和人口學家預期，
死亡率將維持在某個特定水平。
And then, we see just all these spikes and peaks and valleys.
在圖表上，我們可以看到這些起伏波動，
But it does seem like it is starting to drop
back off to expected levels.
但似乎確實開始回落到預期水平。
So, what does that tell us?
這表示甚麼？
Well, unfortunately, we are still seeing increases
in conditions like cancers.
不幸的是，我們仍然看到數字增加，例如癌症等疾病，
And I believe we've only seen the tip of the iceberg on that.
我相信這只是冰山一角。
But we know that deaths that are related to the vaccine.
但我們知道，與疫苗相關的死亡，
Commonly occur relatively quickly after
people have gotten the injection.
通常是在接種後，相對較短的時間內發生，
Whether it's the initial series of two shots or a booster.
不論是最初的兩針還是加強劑。
That said, conditions like cardiac, you know, cardiac injuries.
話雖如此，像心臟問題、心臟損傷、
Myocarditis, pericarditis, neurologic conditions, cancers.
心肌炎、心包炎、神經系統疾病、癌症等疾病，
Those things are going to be delayed.
這些情況是延後才出現。
So, we'd expect to see some flattening of the curve.
因此趨勢有所平緩是我們預期之內，
Because of the deaths related to the
acute phase negative responses.
因為與急性期反應相關的死亡數字。
Like blood clots and sudden cardiac
deaths related to the injections.
例如疫苗引起的血栓和心因性猝死，
There is going to be a sort of a lagging indicator,
if you will.
都會有一種滯後指標，你可以這樣理解，
Of those disease processes that take a longer period of time.
是需要較長時間才能顯現的。
None of the deaths at this point can be attributed to Covid itself.
目前沒有死亡案例可以直接歸因於新冠肺炎，
The virus has done precisely what we would expect it to do.
病毒的表現完全符合我們的預期，
It became more contagious over time and
at the same time less lethal.
時間越久，它變得更具傳染性，同時也變得不那麼致命。
Again, the most serious viral variant was
the Delta wave that occurred in 2020.
而且，最厲害的病毒變種是 2020 年的 Delta 疫潮。
Yet, that is not when we are seeing.
然而，那時候我們沒有見到。
And when countries are reporting the significant increase in deaths.
而各國也沒有報告死亡人數大幅增加。
Right, and the deaths in young people,
it doesn't, the study doesn't parse it out by age.
是的。關於年輕人的死亡，該研究沒有按年齡來區分。
But we have seen that from at least the
United Kingdom government, the CDC.
但至少我們從英國政府、疾控中心看到這一點。
And it begs the super uncomfortable question:
這引發了一個非常令人不安的問題：
Did we have to have done this?
我們真的有必要這樣做嗎？
Because it even cites that at a global level.
因為研究甚至指出，在全球層面，
The pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate
was 0.03% for people under 60.
在接種疫苗之前，60 歲以下人群的感染死亡率為 0.03%。
0.07% for people under 70.
70 歲以下為 0.07%，
And for children under the age of
19 the Infection Fatality Rate was 0.0003%.
19 歲以下兒童的感染死亡率為 0.0003%。
So, this is a risk-benefit analysis we
were not allowed but we can have it now.
以往這個風險效益分析是被禁止的，
但現在可以進行了。
And it's damning, wouldn't you say?
這無疑是嚴重的譴責，你不覺得嗎？
Yes, and this is something I reported on from essentially day one.
是的，這件事我從一開始就報告了。
We knew from the very beginning that.
從一開始我們就知道，
Children, and I use that term loosely.
「兒童」 —— 這只是通稱。
It's really healthy people under the age of,
say 25 or even 30.
實際是指 25 或 30 歲以下的健康人士，
Where it's such a de minimis risk from
Covid as to be fundamentally indistinguishable fromzero.
新冠病毒對他們構成的風險微不足道，基本上與零無異。
They were at no serious risk from this.
對他們並不構成嚴重風險，
We knew that people who had obesity,
diabetes, and heart disease were
the people whowereat the highest risk.
我們知道，患有肥胖症、糖尿病和心臟病的人風險最高，
The vast majority of the public was otherwise not at risk at all.
其餘廣大民眾根本沒有風險，
And we knew that from the beginning.
從一開始我們就知道，
I and the few others who tried to report on it.
我和其他少數嘗試報告此事，
Were egregiously censored, shut down,
threatened, ridiculed.
皆受到異乎尋常的審查、封殺、恐嚇和嘲笑。
I got kicked off of every social media platform
from nearly day one.
幾乎從第一天起，我就被所有社交媒體平台封殺了。
We knew this.
我們是知道的。
Furthermore, we knew that.
再者，我們也知道，
The idea of trying to do a mass vaccination
program in the midst of a pandemic.
在大流行期間推行大規模疫苗接種計劃，
Violates every fundamental rule of vaccinology,
epidemiology and virology.
是違反了所有疫苗學、流行病學和病毒學的基本原則。
There's a reason we never initiate a vaccine
program during an active pandemic.
在疫情活躍期間，我們從不推行疫苗計劃，這是有其原因的。
Because it drives viral mutations in ways
that you otherwise wouldn't see it happen innature.
因為接種會驅使病毒變異，其方式是不會在自然界中出現。
And you can end up setting off a far worse outbreak.
最終便會引發一場更嚴重的疫情爆發，
Furthermore, there's a reason why the average
vaccine takes six to eight years to come tomarket.
此外，一般的疫苗需 6 至 8 年才能推出市場，是有其原因。
If it ever makes it to market at all.
假如最終真的能夠推出市場，
There are a heck of a lot of ex-viruses.
以前有很多病毒，
For which we've tried to come up with a
safe and effective vaccine.
我們試圖為其開發安全有效的疫苗，
And haven't been able to do it.
但始終沒有成功。
Think about things like herpes, norovirus,
coxsackievirus, rhinovirus.
譬如疱疹、諾羅病毒、柯薩奇病毒、
鼻病毒等，
lots of viruses out there.
林林總總的病毒。
This isn't something you can just,
you know, whomp up in your basement in a matter of months.
疫苗不是在幾個月內，就能在地下室匆忙拼湊出來的東西。
And the mRNA technology,
despite what people have been told or led to believe.
至於 mRNA 技術，儘管人們被告知或被引導去相信，
Is not a safe and well-tested platform.
但它並非一個安全和經過充分測試的平台。
Scientists have been working on it for well more than a decade.
科學家研究 mRNA 遠超過十年了，
But it has failed, and failed miserably,
on every previous attempt to make a vaccine.
但每次研制疫苗的嘗試都失敗，徹底的失敗收場。
Sometimes where all of the animals died, for example.
有時甚至導致所有動物死亡，
So, this vaccine had every markings of something
that was dangerous.
因此，這種疫苗具備了危險物品的所有特徵。
It was unnecessary.
是沒有必要推行的。
It was unsafe and it was ineffective.
既不安全又無效。
The three legs of the stool that are required to roll something out.
在推出市場前，必須考慮三大準則，
Safety, efficacy and necessity.
安全性、有效性和必要性，
And it failed on all three of those.
而它在這三方面皆不達標。
Geez, I mean the data is just
continuing to prove you right.
天哪，我的意思是，數據一直證明你是正確的。
When you know, you were
punished for saying those things.
但你卻因為說出來，而遭受懲罰。
One thing, though that the authors
conclude of this study is that.
還有一點，縱然這項研究的作者作出結論。
Yes, there are serious concerns about
continued excess deaths in Western nations.
是的，西方國家持續出現超額死亡，情況令人非常憂慮。
And so they say, and this is
the sort of law part of it.
因此，他們提到法律的角色，
Like, okay, government leaders and
policymakers need to thoroughly
investigate underlyingcauses of persistent excess mortality.
對於持續出現超額死亡，
政府領導和政策制定者要深入調查成因。
Well, I don't trust those groups of
people to investigate themselves.
好吧，我不相信那些人會調查自己。
So, who do we turn to?
那我們該向誰尋求幫助呢？
Well, you're exactly right,
and they're doing everything they can to obfuscate.
你說得完全正確，他們正竭盡所能地混淆視聽。
They would like very much to get rid
of the small control group that exists.
他們很想擺脫現時存在的對照小組，
People like me, who were never vaccinated for Covid.
即是像我這種從未接種新冠疫苗的人，
And are not showing these increases in cancers,
autoimmune diseases.
並沒有出現癌症、自身免疫疾病。
Neurologic conditions, cardiac injury, those sorts of things.
神經系統疾病、心臟損傷等病發率上升的，
They are at the ready to roll out the next pandemic in.
他們已準備好在下一次疫情大流行時，再次推行。
Again, I believe, in an effort to number one,
foist an additional mRNA vaccine on people.
我相信，第一，強制人們接種多一劑 mRNA 疫苗。
And number two, to muddy the waters further.
第二，就是進一步混淆視聽。
About what could possibly be the cause
of the excess deaths and the excess injuries.
關於超額死亡和身體受損的成因，
So many of the things that they label as "Long Covid".
他們將許多症狀歸類為「長新冠」，
And don't get me wrong, you know.
別誤會我的意思，
Long Covid, what we called previous to Covid.
「長新冠」，在新冠疫情前稱為「病毒後症候群」。
Post-viral syndrome does exist.
它是確實存在的，
There are many respiratory viruses, including influenza.
有許多呼吸道病毒，包括流感，
That can cause a prolonged syndrome,
following infection.
可以在感染後導致長期綜合症，
That said, the vast majority of the cases
that are being called Long Covid
話雖如此，絕大多數「長新冠」的病例，
are actually vaccine injury.
實際上是疫苗傷害。
Because if you look at the number
of people who haven't been vaccinated, like myself, hadCovid.
因為，當你看看那些從未接種疫苗卻感染新冠病毒的人。
Like myself, there are lots of us out there.
像我這樣的人，其實有很多，
Interestingly, there's very low incidents of.
有趣的是，在未接種疫苗的人群中，
"Long Covid", in people who were not vaccinated.
所謂「長新冠」的病例是非常低的。
Wow, that's something I had not considered.
哇，這是我之前沒有考慮到的。
So, okay, well, thank you for breaking this down for us.
好的，感謝你向我們剖析。
Again, this is something that you've been
saying for a while and were attacked for it.
同樣，這是你一直在講說的事情，並因此遭受抨擊。
So, thank you so much for coming on
Redacted for the first time.
非常感謝你首次出席 Redacted 節目。
It was a pleasure to have you,
please come back another time.
很榮幸能邀請到你，歡迎下次再來。
Thank you, I'd be delighted to join you again.
謝謝，我很樂意下次再來。
Ref：錫安日報 2012 榮耀盼望 vol. 764 (20240929)
沒有留言:
張貼留言