正如剛才提到，特朗普提名小羅拔‧甘迺迪，
成為今屆政府的衛生部長。
因為在美國，唯有他具備背景、能力、膽識和政治影響力，
能以一人之力，對抗整個醫藥利益集團。
小羅拔‧甘迺迪，現年71歲，出身美國政治名聲顯赫的世家。
作為甘迺迪家族成員之一，
他的伯父是第35任總統，約翰‧甘迺迪，
父親羅拔‧甘迺迪曾任司法部長。
哥哥約翰‧甘迺迪於1963年遇刺身亡後，
1968 年，羅拔‧甘迺迪參與民主黨初選，
當時已大比數領先，有機會勝出黨內選舉，但同年被刺身亡。
小羅拔‧甘迺迪作為家族裡僅存的政治人物，他深明政治的黑暗。
在龐大的利益集團面前，膽敢動別人的「奶酪」，
隨時性命不保，他的父親、伯父，就是最好的例子。
再者，提名他做衛生部長的特朗普，亦曾遇刺，
只是行動以失敗告終。
他深知向醫藥利益集團宣戰，如同捅破馬蜂窩，
即使他出身重量級政治世家，也會招致殺身之禍。
然而，為何他明知這條路，近乎是一條必死之路，
他仍然願意擺上呢？明顯，他就是聖經提及，
好撒馬利亞人的故事。
一個富家弟子，大半生享盡榮華富貴，
卻目睹大量美國人的健康，被醫藥利益集團所奪去，
一生受慢性病折磨，所有財富都用於供養這些集團。
甚至，每個美國嬰兒，一出生就接種大量疫苗，
因而患上不同疾病，一生受盡疾病折磨，
成為醫藥利益集團獲取龐大醫藥費的工具，
成為他們的養份。這就是美國現時可怕的光景。
小羅拔‧甘迺迪就是不忍心的好撒馬利亞人，
縱使自己並非當中的受害者，卻願意負上性命的代價去抗衡。
他亦絕對知道好撒馬利亞人的故事，
因為他父親中槍後，正是被送到好撒馬利亞人醫院搶救。
他因為目睹父親被刺殺離世，長大後染上毒癮，
16歲就因吸毒被捕，直到十多年後，29歲才成功戒毒。
曾經沉淪毒海多年，他深知疾病之苦。
後來他擔任律師工作，官司內容都與環境保護及反疫苗有關。
以下，是小羅拔‧甘迺迪的專訪內容。
YouTube片段：
There is nothing more profitable in
our society today than a sick child.
在現今的社會中，沒有什麼比病童更能帶來利潤，
Because it, all of these entities are making money on him.
藉此，所有以下的機構都從中獲利。
The insurance companies, the hospitals,
the medical cartel, the pharmaceutical
companies have lifetime annuities.
保險公司、醫院、醫療壟斷集團、
製藥公司都能獲得終身年金。
And the earlier that kid is sick, they don't want to kill them.
孩子生病得越早，他們就越不想他喪命，
They want him sick for the rest of their lives.
希望他有生之年都疾病纏身。
And we have now a whole generation.
我們現在有一整代人，
When myuncle was president
當我伯父擔任總統時，
6%ofAmericans had chronic disease,
today it's 60%. 6%
美國人患有慢性疾病，如今比例是60%。
When myuncle was president
當我伯父擔任總統時，
do you know what the annual cost of
treating chronic disease was in this country?
你知道美國每年用於治療慢性疾病的開支是多少嗎？
Zero.
零．
There weren't even any drugs invented for it.
甚至沒有任何藥物被發明出來用於治療慢性病。
Zero.
零．
Today, it's about $4.3 trillion.
如今，這開支約為4.3兆美元。
—Whenyour uncle was president.
—當你伯父擔任總統時。
And none of it is necessary.
這一切都是不必要的。
—Whatwas the autism rate in 1960, do we know?
—1960年自閉症患病率是多少，知道嗎？
In 1960, the autism rate.
1960 年，自閉症患病率。
There's about 4 or 5 studies.
大約有4到5項研究，
And the highest rates, say about 1 in 1,500,
1 in 2,500, 1 in 10,000.
最高的患病率，大約是1/1,500、1/2,500、1/10,000。
So, that, you know, it was somewhere between
1 in 1,500 and 1 in 10,000.
所以，介乎1/1,500到1/10,000之間。
Today it's 1 in every 34 kids, according to CDC.
根據美國疾控中心的數據，如今每34個孩子中就有1個，
And in some states, like California.
在某些州份，例如加州，
I think maybe Utah and New Jersey, 1 in 22.
可能還有猶他州和新澤西州，比例是1/22，
1 in 22 kids.
22 個孩子中就有1個。
And you know, these kids should be healthy.
這些孩子本應是健康的，
These kids should be our highest-performing kids.
這些孩子本應是表現最優秀的，
And they instead are, you know,
have this extraordinary disability
他們反而患有這種特殊殘疾，
that's going to keep them dependent.
使他們無法自立。
If you're full-blown autism, you know,
如果你患有嚴重自閉症，
it's a non-verbal, non-toilet trained,
head banging, stimming, toe walking.
這意味著不說話、不會如廁、撞頭、
自我刺激、踮腳走路。
These are kids that will never throw a baseball.
這些孩子永遠不會扔棒球，
They'll never graduate high school.
他們永遠不會高中畢業，
They'll never go out and take a girl on a date.
他們永遠不會外出和女孩約會，
They'll never use the toilet alone.
他們永遠不會獨自上廁所，
They'll never write a play.
他們永遠不會寫劇本，
They'll never write a poem.
他們永遠不會寫詩，
They'll never vote.
他們永遠不會投票，
—Never have children.
—永遠不會有孩子，
Never pay taxes.
永遠不會納稅。
—Sothat just seems like such an emergency.
—這樣看來是個緊急情況。
And for me, like, if I could save one of these kids
在我而言，如果我能拯救其中一個孩子，
it would be worth giving my life for it.
為此犧牲我的性命也是值得的。
I'm 70 years old.
我已經70歲了，
To save one kid at birth
拯救一個初生嬰兒，
it would be worth dying for.
值得我為此而犧牲性命。
And to the opportunity and
the need for me to save all of these kids
要是有機會和需要拯救所有這些孩子，
I would do anything for.
我願意做任何事。
片段中提到，他目睹美國人幾十年來，喪失健康的過程，
他的至親也死於暗殺。
從他口中說出這句話︰
「我願意用自己的性命，去換取一個美國嬰孩的健康」，
他絕對明白這句話的真正意思和代價。
因此，特朗普作為共和黨總統，
卻提名民主黨背景的小羅拔‧甘迺迪為衛生部長。
一如所料，特朗普的提名，就像揭開潘多拉盒子，
引起極大反彈。
因為，假如小羅拔‧甘迺迪的提名，成功通過的話，
對醫藥利益集團而言，必定是沉重打擊。
尤其是，他們知道特朗普也反疫苗，
意味著特朗普上台後，所有人都有被清算的可能。
於是，他們立即作出部署，首先，
安排拜登卸任前簽署法令，
史無前例地預防式特赦抗疫要員福奇，
即新冠肺炎大流行期間，
執掌抗疫實權的首席醫療顧問福奇（AnthonyFauci），
讓他免於被特朗普追究。
大家可以想像，假如新冠疫苗真的如福奇所言，
是非常安全，可以讓所有美國人不斷接種的話，
那麼，他又何罪之有？既然沒有犯罪、不會罪成，
拜登又何需給予「預防式特赦」？
再者，大家亦可以想想，一個小小的衛生官員，
能讓總統做出如此破格的舉動，令自己的總統生涯留下污點嗎？
還是福奇這個人，對於龐大的醫藥利益集團非常重要，
一旦他被捕或被盤問，將會對他們產生重大影響？
新聞片段：
拜登今日遭受嚴厲批評，
Joe Biden is being blasted today
因他作為總統的最後一項決定，
after his final act as president
提前赦免其盟友及家庭成員。
granted pre-emptive pardons to allies and family members
這些尚未被刑事定罪的人，
who have not been criminally convicted.
拜登廣泛地向所有家人頒布赦免令，
Joe Biden issued sweeping pardons to his entire family
還包括安東尼‧福奇、麗茲‧錢尼、退役將軍馬克‧米利。
as well as Anthony Fauci, Liz Cheney,
retired General Mark Milley
以及參與調查1月6日國會事件的委員會成員。
and January 6 committee members.
此舉對拜登、其家人和他赦免的所有人的形象，均有負面影響。
The pre-emptive pardons are not a good look for Joe Biden,
his family and everyone he has pardoned.
許多人認為，如果他們問心無愧，就不需被赦免。
With many suggesting if you've done
nothing wrong you shouldn't need to be pardoned.
特朗普長子在X平台再次評論，
Donald Trump Jr reiterated this on X saying.
他不需接受赦免令，
He doesn't have to accept the pardon.
如果沒做錯事，就該像個男人堂堂正正地拒絕赦免。
If he did nothing wrong, be a man and turn it down.
但你知道他不會拒絕，因為人人皆知他做了太多虧心事。
But you know he won't because everyone
knows he's guilty of so much.
美國聯邦參議員蘭德·保羅附和說，
USSenator Rand Paul agrees saying.
如果對新冠疫情的責任歸屬還存有疑問，
If there was ever any doubt as to who
bears responsibility for the Covid pandemic.
拜登對福奇的赦免已給出了最終答案。
Biden's pardon of Fauci forever seals the deal.
作為參議院國土安全和政府事務委員會主席，
As chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs Committee
在真相完全曝光之前我絕不會罷休，
I will not rest until the entire truth of the cover-up is exposed.
福奇獲得赦免只會加快揭露這個騙局。
Fauci's pardon will only serve as
an accelerant to pierce the veil of deception.
真可恥！
Ignominious!
安東尼‧福奇將在歷史上留下紀錄，
Anthony Fauci will go down in history,
成為首位因其罪行而被預先赦免的政府科學家。
as the first government scientist to be
pre-emptively pardoned for a crime.
Sky新聞主持人詹姆斯‧莫羅今天也公開抨擊拜登的赦免令，
Sky News host James Morrow has also come
out today blasting Biden for the pardons
稱赦免令是對不法行為的重大承認。
saying they are a great admission of wrongdoing.
我想知道你對這個最後行動的看法，
I want to get your thoughts on this final act
拜登總統簽發赦免令，
from President Biden which is to issue all these pardons.
給予福奇、米利、1月6日國會事件委員會和家人。
Fauci, Milley, J6, family members
我的意思是，他到處亂發赦免令。
mean he's throwing them everywhere like.
好的，你知道在演講中有那一刻，
Okay, so this is, I mean,
you know you had that moment in the speech.
當特朗普在那裡，拜登就在他身旁，
When Donald Trump was there,
and he had Joe Biden off to his side there
他在談論這個腐敗的系統，
and he was talking about this corrupt system,
而拜登只能坐在那裡聽著。
while Joe Biden had to just sit there
天哪，那真是對拜登的一項控訴，
and boy that was such an indictment of what Joe Biden,
更準確地說，是對操控拜登的人的所作所為控訴，
or rather the people handling Joe Biden had just done.
這些赦免令跟我以前見過的都不一樣。
These pardons are like nothing else I've ever seen.
你知道在四年前，
You know four years ago,
拜登說過，任何人都不會獲得預先赦免，
Joe Biden said that anybody,
that there would be no pre-emptive pardons for anybody
他的家人、他的政府等等。
in his family or in his administration or anything like that.
多年來，民主黨一直聲稱，接受赦免就代表承認犯罪，
For years, Democrats have said that
if you accept a pardon that means you're guilty.
他們指責的是1月6日國會山莊騷亂參與者，
And they were saying that in reference to the J6 people
那些參與者可能在短時間內就被特赦。
who are going to be pardoned possibly
at the Capital One Arena just in a few moments time.
但拜登這件事的意義，不止是認罪那麼簡單，
But what this is here, this is not just an admission.
我認為裡面有值得報導的東西，
I think that there is real stuff to be covered here.
無論是與福奇有關的，
Whether it is with Fauci.
你知道，他利用中國實驗室來規避。
And, you know, his use of Chinese labs to subvert
美國自2014年以來對功能增益基因研究的限制，
gain-of-function research restrictions in
the United States going back to 2014.
無論是關於貪腐行為，
Whether it is about influence corruption
以及拜登家族收買權力。
and buying of influence by other members
of the Biden family,
我們知道米蘭達‧迪瓦恩在她的書中對此有詳細描述，
and we know that's been detailed by
people like Miranda Devine in her books,
她是《紐約郵報》的專欄作家。
our colleague at the New York Post.
又或者，1月6日國會事件委員會，
Or you know people on the J6 committee
有證據顯示有人篡改了證人陳述書等東西。
who there’s evidence tampered with
witness statements and things like that.
特朗普的回應，是刻意撤走保護福奇的特工，
稱福奇賺了很多錢，可以自己僱用保安。
新聞片段：昨晚，安東尼·福奇的保安團隊被撤銷了，
Security detail for Anthony Fauci was terminated last night Sir.
你對此有何評論？
Do you have a comment.
沒有，我想你知道，當你為政府工作時，
No, I think you know when you work for government
總有一天你的保安團隊會被撤走。
at some point your security detail comes off.
你要知道，你不可能永遠擁有保安團隊，
And, you know, you can't have them forever.
他們都賺了很多錢，可以自僱保安人員。
They all made a lot of money they can
hire their own security too.
你提到的所有人，
All the people you're talking about.
他們可以外出。
They can go out.
我可以給他們一些非常好的保安人員聯繫方式，
I can give them some good numbers of
very good security people,
他們可以自僱安保，
they can hire their own security.
他們都賺了很多錢，
They all made a lot of money.
福奇也賺了很多錢。
Fauci made a lot of money.
如果他們有這麼強烈的感覺，都可以這樣做，
They all did so if they, you know, felt that strongly.
當然，我不會為此承擔責任。
I think that, certainly I would not take responsibility.
2024 年12月9日的新聞報導，
77名諾貝爾獎得主聯署，反對小羅拔‧甘迺迪擔任美國衛生部長。
如之前提及，學者們得到諾貝爾獎，正因背後有龐大財團支持。
當面對外敵時，諾貝爾獎得主就要為這些財團發聲，
站出來表態，試圖影響美國公眾，將小羅拔‧甘迺迪，
打造成腦袋有問題的陰謀論者。
2025 年1月29日的提名聽證會中，
火花四濺，小羅拔‧甘迺迪反疫苗的立場，
令他成為眾矢之的，被眾人攻擊。
而答問環節前，小羅拔‧甘迺迪說出他的願景，
就是讓美國人再次健康起來。
新聞片段：
克拉波主席，
Chairman Crapo,
資深議員韋登及本委員會的諸位成員，
Ranking member Wyden and
members of this distinguished committee.
今天我懷著謙遜的心坐在這裡，
I am humbled to be sitting here today
成為特朗普總統的提名人選，監管美國衛生及公共服務部。
as President Trump's nominee to
oversee the US Department of Health and Human Services.
我要感謝特朗普總統對我的信任，
I want to thank President Trump for entrusting me
去履行他讓美國重現健康的諾言。
to deliver on his promise to makeAmerica healthy again.
我也要感謝妻子謝麗爾，
I also want to thank Cheryl
基克、博比和今天在場的所有兒女，
and Kick, and Bobby and all my other children who are here today
以及我整個大家庭的所有親人。
and all the many members of my large extended family,
感謝他們無私奉獻的愛，
for the love that they have so generously shared.
我們家族一直投身於公共服務，
Ours has always been a family that
has been involved in public service
我希望延續這個傳統。
and I look forward to continuing that tradition.
我對健康問題的探索，始於我作為環境律師的工作，
Myjourney into the issue of
health began with my career as an environmental attorney.
我與獵人和漁民共事，
Working with hunters and fishermen
也與哈德遜山谷和哈德遜河畔小鎮的母親們共事。
and mothers in the small town on the
Hudson Valley and along the Hudson River.
我很早就領悟到，
I learned very early on
人類健康和環境損害密不可分，
that human health and environmental injuries are intertwined.
殺死魚類的化學物質同樣也會使人類生病。
The same chemicals that kill fish make people sick also.
如今美國人民的整體健康狀況令人堪憂，
TodayAmericans' overall health is in a grievous condition.
七成以上的成年人和三分之一的兒童過重或過胖，
Over 70% of adults and a third of
children are overweight or obese.
糖尿病發病率比1960年代高出十倍，
Diabetes is 10 times more prevalent than it was during 1960s.
年輕人中癌症發病率每年上升百分之一到二，
Cancer among young people is rising by one or two percent a year.
自身免疫疾病、
Autoimmune diseases,
神經發展失調、
Neurodevelopmental disorders,
阿茲海默氏症、
Alzheimer's,
哮喘、
Asthma,
注意力不足及過動症、
ADHD,
抑鬱症、
Depression.
成癮以及許多其他身心健康問題正在增加。
Addiction and a host of other physical
and mental health conditions are all on the rise
其中一些呈指數級增長，
some of them exponentially.
美國的健康狀況比任何其他發達國家都差。
The United States has worst health than
any other developed nation
但醫療保健開支上卻遠超其他國家，
yet we spend more on healthcare
至少是其他國家的兩倍，
at least double,
某些情況下更達其他國家的三倍。
and in some cases triple as other countries.
去年我們花費了4.8萬億美元，
還未計算像缺勤等間接成本，
Last year we spent $4.8 trillion not
counting the indirect costs of missed work.
這約等於國內生產總值的五分之一，
That's almost a fifth of GDP.
相當於對整個經濟征收20%的稅收。
It's tantamount to a 20% tax on the entire economy.
難怪美國難以與醫療支出只有我們三分之一的國家競爭，
No wonderAmerica has trouble competing
with countries that pay a third of what we do for health,
對方擁有更好的醫療成效和更健康的勞動力，
and have better outcomes and have a healthier workforce.
但我不想過分強調金錢，
But I don't want to make this too much about money.
而是人道災難驅使我們重視。
It's the human tragedy that moves us to care.
特朗普總統承諾要恢復美國的全球實力和重振美國夢，
President Trump has promised to
restore America's global strength and to
restore the American dream.
他深知，若國民患病，就無法成為強國。
But he understands that we can't
be a strong nation when our people are so sick.
健康的人有千個夢想，
Ahealthy person has a thousand dreams.
病人卻只有一個夢想。Asick person has only one.
小羅拔‧甘迺迪指出，當人生病時，任何夢想都會幻滅，
那人只會有一個夢想，就是希望自己能夠康復。
正如他的專訪所說，疫苗就是令美國嬰兒從小患病的根源。
而特朗普的計劃，就是調查兒童疫苗。
YouTube片段：
讓我問你關於小羅伯特‧甘迺迪的事，
Let me ask you about RFK Jr.
他明顯提到了他對疫苗的懷疑，
He has obviously talked about his skepticism of vaccines.
他也對兒童疫苗表示反對。
He's expressed opposition to childhood vaccines.
那麼，你是否支持取消兒童疫苗？
Do you want to see childhood vaccines eliminated?
如果疫苗對兒童有害的話，留意⋯⋯
If they're dangerous for the children, look…
所以有這可能？
So possibly?
當你看看我們國家的問題時，
When you look at some of the problems.
特別是與疾病和健康相關的情況時，
When you look at what's going on
with disease and sickness in our country.
似乎有些不對勁。
Something's wrong.
你是在說自閉症嗎？
Are you talking about autism?
嗯，如果你看看自閉症，
25年前自閉症幾乎是不存在的，
Well, if you take a look at autism,
you go back 25 years autism was almost non-existent.
那時每十萬人中只有一位，
現在幾乎每一百人中就有一位。
It was, you know, one out of 100,000
and now it's close to one out of 100.
嗯⋯⋯
Well…
我的意思是，究竟怎麼回事？
I mean what's happening?
然而，聽證會中，小羅拔‧甘迺迪反疫苗的立場，
令他不斷被攻擊。
YouTube片段：
甘迺迪先生，你多年來就疫苗的言論，自相矛盾，
Mr. Kennedy, you have spent years
pushing conflicting stories about vaccines.
你一時這樣說，一時又那樣說，
You say one thing and then you say another.
在你今天宣誓作證時，你否認
In your testimony today under oath,
you denied that
你是反疫苗人士，
you were anti-vaccine.
但在2023年7月的一次播客訪談中，
But during a podcast interview in July of 2023,
你說過：「沒有任何疫苗是安全和有效的」。
you said, “No vaccine is safe and effective” .
在你今天的證詞中，為了證明你不是反疫苗人士，
In your testimony today, in order to prove you're not anti-vax,
你提到你所有孩子都接種了疫苗，
you note that all your kids are vaccinated.
但在2020年的一個播客中，我引述你的話，
But in a podcast in 2020, you said, and I quote.
「你願意做任何事，付出任何代價，
“You would do anything, pay anything
只為回到過去不讓孩子接種疫苗。」
to go back in time and not vaccinate your kids”.
甘迺迪先生，這些說法不能並存。
Mr. Kennedy, all of these things cannot be true.
那麼，你今天在國會面前說你支持疫苗，是否在撒謊？
So, are you lying to Congress today
when you say you are pro-vaccine?
還是你在參與播客時撒謊？
Or did you lie on all those podcasts?
順帶一提，這些全部都有錄音為證，
Wehave all of this on tape, by the way,
參議員，如你所知，這些說法已被多次駁斥，
Senator, as you know, because
it's been repeatedly debunked.
我在LexFridman的播客中說的那句話，
只是整段聲明的一部分，
that statement that I made on the
Lex Fridman podcast was a fragment of this statement.
任何有真正看過那個播客的人都會明白，
He asked me, and anybody who actually goes
and looks at that podcast will see this.
他問我，是否有安全和有效的疫苗？
He asked me, are there vaccines that are safe and effective?
我回答他，有些活性病毒疫苗是安全和有效的，
And I said to him, some of the live virus vaccines are.
正如剛才提到，特朗普提名小羅拔‧甘迺迪，
成為今屆政府的衛生部長。 因為在美國，唯有他具備背景、能力、膽識和政治影響力， 能以一人之力，對抗整個醫藥利益集團。 小羅拔‧甘迺迪，現年71歲，出身美國政治名聲顯赫的世家。 作為甘迺迪家族成員之一， 他的伯父是第35任總統，約翰‧甘迺迪， 父親羅拔‧甘迺迪曾任司法部長。 哥哥約翰‧甘迺迪於1963年遇刺身亡後， 1968 年，羅拔‧甘迺迪參與民主黨初選， 當時已大比數領先，有機會勝出黨內選舉，但同年被刺身亡。 小羅拔‧甘迺迪作為家族裡僅存的政治人物，他深明政治的黑暗。 在龐大的利益集團面前，膽敢動別人的「奶酪」， 隨時性命不保，他的父親、伯父，就是最好的例子。 再者，提名他做衛生部長的特朗普，亦曾遇刺， 只是行動以失敗告終。 他深知向醫藥利益集團宣戰，如同捅破馬蜂窩， 即使他出身重量級政治世家，也會招致殺身之禍。 然而，為何他明知這條路，近乎是一條必死之路， 他仍然願意擺上呢？明顯，他就是聖經提及， 好撒馬利亞人的故事。 一個富家弟子，大半生享盡榮華富貴， 卻目睹大量美國人的健康，被醫藥利益集團所奪去， 一生受慢性病折磨，所有財富都用於供養這些集團。 甚至，每個美國嬰兒，一出生就接種大量疫苗， 因而患上不同疾病，一生受盡疾病折磨， 成為醫藥利益集團獲取龐大醫藥費的工具， 成為他們的養份。這就是美國現時可怕的光景。 小羅拔‧甘迺迪就是不忍心的好撒馬利亞人， 縱使自己並非當中的受害者，卻願意負上性命的代價去抗衡。 他亦絕對知道好撒馬利亞人的故事， 因為他父親中槍後，正是被送到好撒馬利亞人醫院搶救。 他因為目睹父親被刺殺離世，長大後染上毒癮， 16歲就因吸毒被捕，直到十多年後，29歲才成功戒毒。 曾經沉淪毒海多年，他深知疾病之苦。 後來他擔任律師工作，官司內容都與環境保護及反疫苗有關。 以下，是小羅拔‧甘迺迪的專訪內容。 YouTube片段： There is nothing more profitable in our society today than a sick child. 在現今的社會中，沒有什麼比病童更能帶來利潤， Because it, all of these entities are making money on him. 藉此，所有以下的機構都從中獲利。 The insurance companies, the hospitals, the medical cartel, the pharmaceutical companies have lifetime annuities. 保險公司、醫院、醫療壟斷集團、 製藥公司都能獲得終身年金。 And the earlier that kid is sick, they don't want to kill them. 孩子生病得越早，他們就越不想他喪命， They want him sick for the rest of their lives. 希望他有生之年都疾病纏身。 And we have now a whole generation. 我們現在有一整代人， When myuncle was president 當我伯父擔任總統時， 6%ofAmericans had chronic disease, today it's 60%. 6% 美國人患有慢性疾病，如今比例是60%。 When myuncle was president 當我伯父擔任總統時， do you know what the annual cost of treating chronic disease was in this country? 你知道美國每年用於治療慢性疾病的開支是多少嗎？ Zero. 零． There weren't even any drugs invented for it. 甚至沒有任何藥物被發明出來用於治療慢性病。 Zero. 零． Today, it's about $4.3 trillion. 如今，這開支約為4.3兆美元。 —Whenyour uncle was president. —當你伯父擔任總統時。 And none of it is necessary. 這一切都是不必要的。 —Whatwas the autism rate in 1960, do we know? —1960年自閉症患病率是多少，知道嗎？ In 1960, the autism rate. 1960 年，自閉症患病率。 There's about 4 or 5 studies. 大約有4到5項研究， And the highest rates, say about 1 in 1,500, 1 in 2,500, 1 in 10,000. 最高的患病率，大約是1/1,500、1/2,500、1/10,000。 So, that, you know, it was somewhere between 1 in 1,500 and 1 in 10,000. 所以，介乎1/1,500到1/10,000之間。 Today it's 1 in every 34 kids, according to CDC. 根據美國疾控中心的數據，如今每34個孩子中就有1個， And in some states, like California. 在某些州份，例如加州， I think maybe Utah and New Jersey, 1 in 22. 可能還有猶他州和新澤西州，比例是1/22， 1 in 22 kids. 22 個孩子中就有1個。 And you know, these kids should be healthy. 這些孩子本應是健康的， These kids should be our highest-performing kids. 這些孩子本應是表現最優秀的， And they instead are, you know, have this extraordinary disability 他們反而患有這種特殊殘疾， that's going to keep them dependent. 使他們無法自立。 If you're full-blown autism, you know, 如果你患有嚴重自閉症， it's a non-verbal, non-toilet trained, head banging, stimming, toe walking. 這意味著不說話、不會如廁、撞頭、 自我刺激、踮腳走路。 These are kids that will never throw a baseball. 這些孩子永遠不會扔棒球， They'll never graduate high school. 他們永遠不會高中畢業， They'll never go out and take a girl on a date. 他們永遠不會外出和女孩約會， They'll never use the toilet alone. 他們永遠不會獨自上廁所， They'll never write a play. 他們永遠不會寫劇本， They'll never write a poem. 他們永遠不會寫詩， They'll never vote. 他們永遠不會投票， —Never have children. —永遠不會有孩子， Never pay taxes. 永遠不會納稅。 —Sothat just seems like such an emergency. —這樣看來是個緊急情況。 And for me, like, if I could save one of these kids 在我而言，如果我能拯救其中一個孩子， it would be worth giving my life for it. 為此犧牲我的性命也是值得的。 I'm 70 years old. 我已經70歲了， To save one kid at birth 拯救一個初生嬰兒， it would be worth dying for. 值得我為此而犧牲性命。 And to the opportunity and the need for me to save all of these kids 要是有機會和需要拯救所有這些孩子， I would do anything for. 我願意做任何事。 片段中提到，他目睹美國人幾十年來，喪失健康的過程， 他的至親也死於暗殺。 從他口中說出這句話︰ 「我願意用自己的性命，去換取一個美國嬰孩的健康」， 他絕對明白這句話的真正意思和代價。 因此，特朗普作為共和黨總統， 卻提名民主黨背景的小羅拔‧甘迺迪為衛生部長。 一如所料，特朗普的提名，就像揭開潘多拉盒子， 引起極大反彈。 因為，假如小羅拔‧甘迺迪的提名，成功通過的話， 對醫藥利益集團而言，必定是沉重打擊。 尤其是，他們知道特朗普也反疫苗， 意味著特朗普上台後，所有人都有被清算的可能。 於是，他們立即作出部署，首先， 安排拜登卸任前簽署法令， 史無前例地預防式特赦抗疫要員福奇， 即新冠肺炎大流行期間， 執掌抗疫實權的首席醫療顧問福奇（AnthonyFauci）， 讓他免於被特朗普追究。 大家可以想像，假如新冠疫苗真的如福奇所言， 是非常安全，可以讓所有美國人不斷接種的話， 那麼，他又何罪之有？既然沒有犯罪、不會罪成， 拜登又何需給予「預防式特赦」？ 再者，大家亦可以想想，一個小小的衛生官員， 能讓總統做出如此破格的舉動，令自己的總統生涯留下污點嗎？ 還是福奇這個人，對於龐大的醫藥利益集團非常重要， 一旦他被捕或被盤問，將會對他們產生重大影響？ 新聞片段： 拜登今日遭受嚴厲批評， Joe Biden is being blasted today 因他作為總統的最後一項決定， after his final act as president 提前赦免其盟友及家庭成員。 granted pre-emptive pardons to allies and family members 這些尚未被刑事定罪的人， who have not been criminally convicted. 拜登廣泛地向所有家人頒布赦免令， Joe Biden issued sweeping pardons to his entire family 還包括安東尼‧福奇、麗茲‧錢尼、退役將軍馬克‧米利。 as well as Anthony Fauci, Liz Cheney, retired General Mark Milley 以及參與調查1月6日國會事件的委員會成員。 and January 6 committee members. 此舉對拜登、其家人和他赦免的所有人的形象，均有負面影響。 The pre-emptive pardons are not a good look for Joe Biden, his family and everyone he has pardoned. 許多人認為，如果他們問心無愧，就不需被赦免。 With many suggesting if you've done nothing wrong you shouldn't need to be pardoned. 特朗普長子在X平台再次評論， Donald Trump Jr reiterated this on X saying. 他不需接受赦免令， He doesn't have to accept the pardon. 如果沒做錯事，就該像個男人堂堂正正地拒絕赦免。 If he did nothing wrong, be a man and turn it down. 但你知道他不會拒絕，因為人人皆知他做了太多虧心事。 But you know he won't because everyone knows he's guilty of so much. 美國聯邦參議員蘭德·保羅附和說， USSenator Rand Paul agrees saying. 如果對新冠疫情的責任歸屬還存有疑問， If there was ever any doubt as to who bears responsibility for the Covid pandemic. 拜登對福奇的赦免已給出了最終答案。 Biden's pardon of Fauci forever seals the deal. 作為參議院國土安全和政府事務委員會主席， As chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee 在真相完全曝光之前我絕不會罷休， I will not rest until the entire truth of the cover-up is exposed. 福奇獲得赦免只會加快揭露這個騙局。 Fauci's pardon will only serve as an accelerant to pierce the veil of deception. 真可恥！ Ignominious! 安東尼‧福奇將在歷史上留下紀錄， Anthony Fauci will go down in history, 成為首位因其罪行而被預先赦免的政府科學家。 as the first government scientist to be pre-emptively pardoned for a crime. Sky新聞主持人詹姆斯‧莫羅今天也公開抨擊拜登的赦免令， Sky News host James Morrow has also come out today blasting Biden for the pardons 稱赦免令是對不法行為的重大承認。 saying they are a great admission of wrongdoing. 我想知道你對這個最後行動的看法， I want to get your thoughts on this final act 拜登總統簽發赦免令， from President Biden which is to issue all these pardons. 給予福奇、米利、1月6日國會事件委員會和家人。 Fauci, Milley, J6, family members 我的意思是，他到處亂發赦免令。 mean he's throwing them everywhere like. 好的，你知道在演講中有那一刻， Okay, so this is, I mean, you know you had that moment in the speech. 當特朗普在那裡，拜登就在他身旁， When Donald Trump was there, and he had Joe Biden off to his side there 他在談論這個腐敗的系統， and he was talking about this corrupt system, 而拜登只能坐在那裡聽著。 while Joe Biden had to just sit there 天哪，那真是對拜登的一項控訴， and boy that was such an indictment of what Joe Biden, 更準確地說，是對操控拜登的人的所作所為控訴， or rather the people handling Joe Biden had just done. 這些赦免令跟我以前見過的都不一樣。 These pardons are like nothing else I've ever seen. 你知道在四年前， You know four years ago, 拜登說過，任何人都不會獲得預先赦免， Joe Biden said that anybody, that there would be no pre-emptive pardons for anybody 他的家人、他的政府等等。 in his family or in his administration or anything like that. 多年來，民主黨一直聲稱，接受赦免就代表承認犯罪， For years, Democrats have said that if you accept a pardon that means you're guilty. 他們指責的是1月6日國會山莊騷亂參與者， And they were saying that in reference to the J6 people 那些參與者可能在短時間內就被特赦。 who are going to be pardoned possibly at the Capital One Arena just in a few moments time. 但拜登這件事的意義，不止是認罪那麼簡單， But what this is here, this is not just an admission. 我認為裡面有值得報導的東西， I think that there is real stuff to be covered here. 無論是與福奇有關的， Whether it is with Fauci. 你知道，他利用中國實驗室來規避。 And, you know, his use of Chinese labs to subvert 美國自2014年以來對功能增益基因研究的限制， gain-of-function research restrictions in the United States going back to 2014. 無論是關於貪腐行為， Whether it is about influence corruption 以及拜登家族收買權力。 and buying of influence by other members of the Biden family, 我們知道米蘭達‧迪瓦恩在她的書中對此有詳細描述， and we know that's been detailed by people like Miranda Devine in her books, 她是《紐約郵報》的專欄作家。 our colleague at the New York Post. 又或者，1月6日國會事件委員會， Or you know people on the J6 committee 有證據顯示有人篡改了證人陳述書等東西。 who there’s evidence tampered with witness statements and things like that. 特朗普的回應，是刻意撤走保護福奇的特工， 稱福奇賺了很多錢，可以自己僱用保安。 新聞片段：昨晚，安東尼·福奇的保安團隊被撤銷了， Security detail for Anthony Fauci was terminated last night Sir. 你對此有何評論？ Do you have a comment. 沒有，我想你知道，當你為政府工作時， No, I think you know when you work for government 總有一天你的保安團隊會被撤走。 at some point your security detail comes off. 你要知道，你不可能永遠擁有保安團隊， And, you know, you can't have them forever. 他們都賺了很多錢，可以自僱保安人員。 They all made a lot of money they can hire their own security too. 你提到的所有人， All the people you're talking about. 他們可以外出。 They can go out. 我可以給他們一些非常好的保安人員聯繫方式， I can give them some good numbers of very good security people, 他們可以自僱安保， they can hire their own security. 他們都賺了很多錢， They all made a lot of money. 福奇也賺了很多錢。 Fauci made a lot of money. 如果他們有這麼強烈的感覺，都可以這樣做， They all did so if they, you know, felt that strongly. 當然，我不會為此承擔責任。 I think that, certainly I would not take responsibility. 2024 年12月9日的新聞報導， 77名諾貝爾獎得主聯署，反對小羅拔‧甘迺迪擔任美國衛生部長。 如之前提及，學者們得到諾貝爾獎，正因背後有龐大財團支持。 當面對外敵時，諾貝爾獎得主就要為這些財團發聲， 站出來表態，試圖影響美國公眾，將小羅拔‧甘迺迪， 打造成腦袋有問題的陰謀論者。 2025 年1月29日的提名聽證會中， 火花四濺，小羅拔‧甘迺迪反疫苗的立場， 令他成為眾矢之的，被眾人攻擊。 而答問環節前，小羅拔‧甘迺迪說出他的願景， 就是讓美國人再次健康起來。 新聞片段： 克拉波主席， Chairman Crapo, 資深議員韋登及本委員會的諸位成員， Ranking member Wyden and members of this distinguished committee. 今天我懷著謙遜的心坐在這裡， I am humbled to be sitting here today 成為特朗普總統的提名人選，監管美國衛生及公共服務部。 as President Trump's nominee to oversee the US Department of Health and Human Services. 我要感謝特朗普總統對我的信任， I want to thank President Trump for entrusting me 去履行他讓美國重現健康的諾言。 to deliver on his promise to makeAmerica healthy again. 我也要感謝妻子謝麗爾， I also want to thank Cheryl 基克、博比和今天在場的所有兒女， and Kick, and Bobby and all my other children who are here today 以及我整個大家庭的所有親人。 and all the many members of my large extended family, 感謝他們無私奉獻的愛， for the love that they have so generously shared. 我們家族一直投身於公共服務， Ours has always been a family that has been involved in public service 我希望延續這個傳統。 and I look forward to continuing that tradition. 我對健康問題的探索，始於我作為環境律師的工作， Myjourney into the issue of health began with my career as an environmental attorney. 我與獵人和漁民共事， Working with hunters and fishermen 也與哈德遜山谷和哈德遜河畔小鎮的母親們共事。 and mothers in the small town on the Hudson Valley and along the Hudson River. 我很早就領悟到， I learned very early on 人類健康和環境損害密不可分， that human health and environmental injuries are intertwined. 殺死魚類的化學物質同樣也會使人類生病。 The same chemicals that kill fish make people sick also. 如今美國人民的整體健康狀況令人堪憂， TodayAmericans' overall health is in a grievous condition. 七成以上的成年人和三分之一的兒童過重或過胖， Over 70% of adults and a third of children are overweight or obese. 糖尿病發病率比1960年代高出十倍， Diabetes is 10 times more prevalent than it was during 1960s. 年輕人中癌症發病率每年上升百分之一到二， Cancer among young people is rising by one or two percent a year. 自身免疫疾病、 Autoimmune diseases, 神經發展失調、 Neurodevelopmental disorders, 阿茲海默氏症、 Alzheimer's, 哮喘、 Asthma, 注意力不足及過動症、 ADHD, 抑鬱症、 Depression. 成癮以及許多其他身心健康問題正在增加。 Addiction and a host of other physical and mental health conditions are all on the rise 其中一些呈指數級增長， some of them exponentially. 美國的健康狀況比任何其他發達國家都差。 The United States has worst health than any other developed nation 但醫療保健開支上卻遠超其他國家， yet we spend more on healthcare 至少是其他國家的兩倍， at least double, 某些情況下更達其他國家的三倍。 and in some cases triple as other countries. 去年我們花費了4.8萬億美元， 還未計算像缺勤等間接成本， Last year we spent $4.8 trillion not counting the indirect costs of missed work. 這約等於國內生產總值的五分之一， That's almost a fifth of GDP. 相當於對整個經濟征收20%的稅收。 It's tantamount to a 20% tax on the entire economy. 難怪美國難以與醫療支出只有我們三分之一的國家競爭， No wonderAmerica has trouble competing with countries that pay a third of what we do for health, 對方擁有更好的醫療成效和更健康的勞動力， and have better outcomes and have a healthier workforce. 但我不想過分強調金錢， But I don't want to make this too much about money. 而是人道災難驅使我們重視。 It's the human tragedy that moves us to care. 特朗普總統承諾要恢復美國的全球實力和重振美國夢， President Trump has promised to restore America's global strength and to restore the American dream. 他深知，若國民患病，就無法成為強國。 But he understands that we can't be a strong nation when our people are so sick. 健康的人有千個夢想， Ahealthy person has a thousand dreams. 病人卻只有一個夢想。Asick person has only one. 小羅拔‧甘迺迪指出，當人生病時，任何夢想都會幻滅， 那人只會有一個夢想，就是希望自己能夠康復。 正如他的專訪所說，疫苗就是令美國嬰兒從小患病的根源。 而特朗普的計劃，就是調查兒童疫苗。 YouTube片段： 讓我問你關於小羅伯特‧甘迺迪的事， Let me ask you about RFK Jr. 他明顯提到了他對疫苗的懷疑， He has obviously talked about his skepticism of vaccines. 他也對兒童疫苗表示反對。 He's expressed opposition to childhood vaccines. 那麼，你是否支持取消兒童疫苗？ Do you want to see childhood vaccines eliminated? 如果疫苗對兒童有害的話，留意⋯⋯ If they're dangerous for the children, look… 所以有這可能？ So possibly? 當你看看我們國家的問題時， When you look at some of the problems. 特別是與疾病和健康相關的情況時， When you look at what's going on with disease and sickness in our country. 似乎有些不對勁。 Something's wrong. 你是在說自閉症嗎？ Are you talking about autism? 嗯，如果你看看自閉症， 25年前自閉症幾乎是不存在的， Well, if you take a look at autism, you go back 25 years autism was almost non-existent. 那時每十萬人中只有一位， 現在幾乎每一百人中就有一位。 It was, you know, one out of 100,000 and now it's close to one out of 100. 嗯⋯⋯ Well… 我的意思是，究竟怎麼回事？ I mean what's happening? 然而，聽證會中，小羅拔‧甘迺迪反疫苗的立場， 令他不斷被攻擊。 YouTube片段： 甘迺迪先生，你多年來就疫苗的言論，自相矛盾， Mr. Kennedy, you have spent years pushing conflicting stories about vaccines. 你一時這樣說，一時又那樣說， You say one thing and then you say another. 在你今天宣誓作證時，你否認 In your testimony today under oath, you denied that 你是反疫苗人士， you were anti-vaccine. 但在2023年7月的一次播客訪談中， But during a podcast interview in July of 2023, 你說過：「沒有任何疫苗是安全和有效的」。 you said, “No vaccine is safe and effective” . 在你今天的證詞中，為了證明你不是反疫苗人士， In your testimony today, in order to prove you're not anti-vax, 你提到你所有孩子都接種了疫苗， you note that all your kids are vaccinated. 但在2020年的一個播客中，我引述你的話， But in a podcast in 2020, you said, and I quote. 「你願意做任何事，付出任何代價， “You would do anything, pay anything 只為回到過去不讓孩子接種疫苗。」 to go back in time and not vaccinate your kids”. 甘迺迪先生，這些說法不能並存。 Mr. Kennedy, all of these things cannot be true. 那麼，你今天在國會面前說你支持疫苗，是否在撒謊？ So, are you lying to Congress today when you say you are pro-vaccine? 還是你在參與播客時撒謊？ Or did you lie on all those podcasts? 順帶一提，這些全部都有錄音為證， Wehave all of this on tape, by the way, 參議員，如你所知，這些說法已被多次駁斥， Senator, as you know, because it's been repeatedly debunked. 我在LexFridman的播客中說的那句話， 只是整段聲明的一部分， that statement that I made on the Lex Fridman podcast was a fragment of this statement. 任何有真正看過那個播客的人都會明白， He asked me, and anybody who actually goes and looks at that podcast will see this. 他問我，是否有安全和有效的疫苗？ He asked me, are there vaccines that are safe and effective? 我回答他，有些活性病毒疫苗是安全和有效的， And I said to him, some of the live virus vaccines are. 時事追擊：吹角者小羅拔甘迺迪 PDF P. 95 - 110Youtube影片: (放在blogger的html位)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1pqkh0JKxw0?si=GQgj8LpTtF3MrzvJ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pqkh0JKxw0
影片：時事追擊：吹角者小羅拔甘迺迪
我接著說，沒有任何疫苗對所有人都是完全安全和有效的。
And I said, there are no vaccines that are safe and effective .
我接著想繼續說，
And I was going to continue.
任何藥物，包括疫苗，都可能對一些人引起過敏反應，
For every person every medicine has people who are sensitive to them, including vaccines.
但他當時打斷了我。
He interrupted me at that point.
我已多次澄清，包括在全國電視上，
I've corrected it many times, including on national TV.
韋登參議員，這一點你是知道的。
You know about this, Senator Wyden.
你此時提起這件事是不誠實的做法，
So bringing this up right now is dishonest.
那麼，讓我們說說你實際做了甚麼？
Let's be clear about what you've actually done then
既然你想否認你的言論，
since you want to deny your statements.
例如，你曾試圖剝奪人們接種疫苗權利，
For example, you have a history of trying to take vaccines away from people.
2021 年5 月，你向食品及藥物管理局請願，
In May of 2021, you petitioned the Food and Drug Administration
不僅要阻止美國人獲取新冠疫苗，
to not only block Americans from having access to the Covid vaccine,
還要阻止未來獲取這救命疫苗的機會。
but to prevent any future access to the lifesaving vaccine.
你會否認這一點嗎？請願書上有你的名字，
Are you denying that? Your name is on the petition.
我們提出這項請願，是因為美國疾病控制與預防中心，
We brought that petition after CDC
在沒有任何科學依據下，建議為六歲兒童接種新冠疫苗。
recommended a Covid vaccine without any scientific basis for six-year-old children.
今天大多數專家都同意，即使是當時作出這項決定的人，
Most experts agree today, even the people who did it back then
新冠疫苗對於六歲兒童來說是不恰當的，
that Covid vaccines are inappropriate for six-year-old children,
因為他們在新冠上幾乎沒有風險。
who basically have a zero risk from Covid.
這就是我提出該訴訟的原因。
That's why I brought that lawsuit.
謝謝主席先生，
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
今早擺在財政委員會面前的問題是，
The question before the Finance Committee this morning
小羅伯特‧甘迺迪是否應該被信任，掌管美國人民的健康和福祉，
is whether Robert F. Kennedy should be trusted with the health and well-being of the American people.
委員會工作人員審查了數千頁的聲明、書籍和播客文字記錄，
Committee staff have examined thousands of pages of statements, books, and podcast transcripts
以評估他的記錄。
in a review of his record.
記錄顯示，甘迺迪先生接受了陰謀論、江湖醫生和騙子，
The receipts show that Mr. Kennedy has embraced conspiracy theories, quacks, charlatans
尤其是在疫苗的安全性和有效性方面。
especially when it comes to the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
他畢生致力於播撒疑慮，
He has made it his life's work to sow doubt
阻止父母讓孩子接種救命疫苗，
and discourage parents from getting their kids lifesaving vaccines.
這為他帶來了豐厚的收益，讓他擁有巨大的權力。
It has been lucrative for him and put him on the verge of immense power.
他追逐金錢和影響力，不管它們把他引向何方，
This is the profile of someone who chases money and influence wherever they lead
即使這可能導致兒童和其他弱勢群體悲慘地死去。
even if that may mean the tragic deaths of children and other vulnerable people.
甘迺迪先生喜歡說，
Now, Mr. Kennedy is fond of saying,
他不是就父母應否給孩子接種疫苗提出建議，
he's not making recommendations about whether parents should vaccinate their children.
他只是在提出問題，給人們選擇。
He's just asking questions and giving people choices.
這是一種狡猾的策略，逃避對自己言行負上真正責任。
It's a slippery tactic to dodge any real responsibility for his words and actions.
在我看來，這種行為來自一個試圖贏得工作的人，是荒謬的。
And it is, in my view, absurd coming from somebody who's trying to win confirmation for a job.
聽證會後，大量網民湧入參議員Ron Wyden 的X 平台留言責罵。
因為在他的議員生涯中，單單來自醫藥公司的捐款，就已經超過150 萬美元。
人們一面倒地指控他，包括貪污、偽君子、講稿由藥業公司提供、
讓人見識到藥業公司說客的威力、行為令選民蒙羞等等。
另一位收受醫藥公司捐款，超過120 萬美元的參議員，是Elizabeth Warren。
同樣，她亦是攻擊小羅拔‧甘迺迪的主攻手。
YouTube 片段：
沃倫參議員。
Senator Warren.
謝謝主席先生，
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
甘迺迪先生，我想從你我都同意的事情開始，
So Mr. Kennedy I want to start with something that I think you and I agree on.
就是大製藥公司在華盛頓的權力過大，
And that is that Big Pharma has too much power in Washington.
你曾說特朗普總統要求你「清除腐敗和利益衝突」，
You've said that President Trump asked you to "clean up corruption and conflicts".
聽起來不錯，
Sounds great.
你還說你會「徹底關閉」政府機構與受監管公司之間的「旋轉門」，
You've said you will "slam shut the revolving door" between government agencies and the companies they regulate.
這也聽起來不錯。
That also sounds great.
所以，一個簡單的問題，
So, here's an easy question.
當你卸任時，你會否承諾至少四年內不接受製藥公司、
Will you commit that when you leave this job you will not accept compensation from a drug company,
醫療設備公司、
a medical device company,
醫院系統、
a hospital system,
或健康保險公司的報酬，
or a health insurer for at least four years,
包括擔任說客或董事會成員？
including as a lobbyist or a board member?
你能重複一下問題的最後一部份？我承諾什麼？
Can you just repeat the last part of the question? Can I commit to what?
你不會以任何形式從製藥公司獲利？
You're not going to take money from drug companies in any way shape or form?
誰？我？
Who? Me?
是的，你。
Yes, you.
我很樂意作出這承諾。
I'm happy to commit to that.
很好，我知道是這樣。
Okay, good, that's what I figured.
正如我說，是個簡單的問題。
I said, it's an easy question to start with.
我認為你在這個問題上是對的，
And I think you're right on this question.
順帶一提，我認為他們都不想給我錢。
I don't think any of them want to give me money, by the way.
讓我們繼續，
Let's keep going.
你回答「是」，是正確的，
You are right to say yes,
因為每個美國人都有權知道，作為我們的頭號衛生官員，
because every American has the right to know that every decision you make,
你所作的每個決定都是為了幫助他們，
as our No. 1 health officer is to help them,
而不是為了你將來賺錢。
and not to make money for yourself in the future.
所以我想多討論金錢問題，
So, I want to talk more about money.
我正在閱讀你的文件，
I'm looking at your paperwork right now.
在過去兩年裡，
In the past two years,
你從 Wisner Baum 律師事務所獲得了250 萬美元。
you've raked in $2.5 million from a law firm called Wisner Baum.
你上網做廣告，
You go online, you do commercials
鼓勵人們與 Wisner Baum 簽約，
to encourage people to sign up with Wisner Baum
加入針對疫苗製造商的訴訟，
to join lawsuits against vaccine makers.
對每個簽約的人，你都會得到報酬，
And for everyone who signs up, you personally get paid
如果贏了官司，你就能拿到他們所贏金額的10%。
and if they win their case, you get 10% of what they win.
所以如果你帶來一個贏得1,000 萬美元的人，
So, if you bring in someone who gets $10 million
你就能獲取100 萬美元，
you walk away with a million dollars.
你剛才說希望美國人民知道，
Now you just said that you want the American people to know
你是不會被收買的。
that you can't be bought,
你的決定不會取決於你將來能賺多少錢，
your decisions won't depend on how much money you could make in the future,
你卸任美國衛生部長後不會為製藥公司工作，
you won't go to work for a drug company after you leave HHS.
但你我都知道，還有另一種賺錢的方式。
But you and I both know there's another way to make money.
所以甘迺迪先生，
So Mr. Kennedy,
你是否也同意在你擔任部長期間以及之後的四年內，
will you also agree that you won't take any compensation from any lawsuits
不會從任何針對製藥公司的訴訟中獲得報酬？
against drug companies while you are Secretary and for four years afterwards?
我當然會在擔任部長期間做出這個承諾，
Well I will certainly commit to that while I'm Secretary.
但我想作出澄清，因為你讓我聽起來像個誘餌。
But I do want to clarify something because you are making me sound like a shill.
我整理了那個案件，
I put together that case,
我為那案件向法官作出科學陳述，讓它進入法庭。
I did the science day presentation to the judge on that case to get it into court,
案件聽證會，
the docket hearing.
甘迺迪先生，這只是一個非常簡單的問題，
Mr. Kennedy, it's just a really simple question.
你拿了250 萬美元。
You've taken in $2.5 million.
我想知道，你現在會否承諾不僅不會為製藥公司工作，
I want to know if you will commit right now that not only will you not go to work for drug companies
在你擔任部長期間以及之後的四年裡，
you won't go to work suing the drug companies and taking your rake out of that
你也不會透過起訴製藥公司，從中獲利。
while you are Secretary and for four years after.
我承諾在擔任部長期間不會收取製藥公司的任何費用。
I will commit to not taking any fees from drug companies while I'm Secretary.
我⋯⋯
I…
不，我問的是起訴製藥公司而獲利。
No, I'm asking about fees from suing drug companies.
你同意不會這樣做？
Will you agree not to do that?
你是要我不起訴製藥公司，我不會同意這點。
You are asking me to not sue drug companies and I'm not going to agree to that.
不，你可以隨意起訴製藥公司。
No, You can sue drug companies as much as you want.
我不會同意不起訴製藥公司或任何人。
I am not going to agree to not sue drug companies or anybody.
讓我們快速盤點一下，如果你獲得確認，作為衛生部長，
So, let's do a quick count here of how as Secretary of HHS if you get confirmed,
你可以影響每項訴訟，
you could influence every one of those lawsuits.
我開始列舉。
Well, let me start the list
你可以用美國政府的信箋，發表你的反疫苗陰謀論，
You could publish your anti-vaccine conspiracies but this time on US government letterhead
陪審團可能會因此受影響。
something a jury might be impressed by.
我不明白你的意思。
I don't understand that.
你可以對美國疾控中心疫苗小組作出任命，
You could appoint people to the CDC vaccine panel
讓與你反疫苗觀點一致的人加入，替你做骯髒的工作。
who share your anti-vax views and let them do your dirty work.
你可以要求美國疾控中心疫苗小組，
You could tell the CDC vaccine panel
從疫苗接種時間表中刪除特定疫苗，
to remove a particular vaccine from the vaccine schedule.
你可以將疫苗從特殊賠償計劃中刪除。
You could remove vaccines from special compensation programs
這將使製造商面臨大規模侵權訴訟，
which would open up manufacturers to mass torts.
即使沒有因果證據，你也可以使更多的損傷有資格獲得賠償。ˉ
You could make more injuries eligible for compensation even if there's no causal evidence
你可以改變疫苗法院的程序，使無理提訴更容易，
You could change vaccine court processes to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits.
你可以將美國食品藥物管理局數據，交給律師事務所的朋友，
You could turn over FDA data to your friends at the law firm
他們可以任意使用來獲利，
and they could use it however it benefited them.
你可以改變疫苗標籤，
You could change vaccine labelling.
你可以改變疫苗資訊規例，
You could change vaccine information rules.
你可以改變疫苗傷害賠償計劃中，哪些索賠能獲得賠償。
You could change which claims are compensated in the vaccine injury compensation program.
擔任衛生部長時，你可以透過多種方式影響未來訴訟和未決訴訟。
There's a lot of ways that you can influence those future lawsuits and pending lawsuits while you are Secretary of HHS
我現在要求你作出承諾，
and I'm asking you to commit right now,
你不會在任何一項訴訟中獲利，
that you will not take a financial stake in every one of those lawsuits,
那麼你作為部長時，不是為了未來在經濟上受益。
so that what you do as Secretary will also benefit you financially down the line.
我會遵守所有道德準則。
I will comply with all the ethical guidelines.
這不是我的問題。
That's not the question.
你和我—— 你反復說過，
You and I — you have said repeatedly.
你是在要求我，
You are asking me.
參議員，你是在要求我不起訴疫苗和製藥公司。
Senator, you're asking me not to sue vaccine, pharmaceutical companies.
—— 不，我沒有，我的問題是停止讓自己致富。
—— No, I am not, my question is stop enriching yourself.
—— 那就是你正在做的事情。
—— Yeah, you are exactly what you’re doing.
看，沒有人該被愚弄。
Look, no one should be fooled here.
作為衛生部長，
As Secretary of HHS.
羅伯特‧甘迺迪將有權力削弱我國的疫苗和疫苗製造，
Robert Kennedy will have the power to undercut vaccines and vaccine manufacturing across our country.
儘管他宣稱「遵循科學」，
And for all of his talk about "follow the science"
並承諾不會干涉想給孩子接種疫苗的人，
and his promise that he won't interfere with those of us who want to vaccinate his kids
但底線是一樣的，
the bottom line is the same.
甘迺迪可以扼殺獲得疫苗的機會，
Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines
同時他還能賺取數百萬美元。
and make millions of dollars while he does it.
孩子們可能會死，但羅伯特‧甘迺迪可以繼續大撈一筆。
Kids might die but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.
參議員，我支持疫苗，
Senator I support vaccines.
我會支持兒童疫苗接種時間表，
I will — I support the childhood schedule.
我會這樣做。
I will do that.
我唯一想要的，就是好的科學，僅此而已。
The only thing I want is good science and that's it.
為何你不說，作為衛生部長，你不會從中獲利？
How about then saying you won't make money off what you do as Secretary of HHS?
在蒂利斯參議員發言之前，
Before we go to Senator Tillis.
我認為有必要清晰地說明，
I think it would be important for me to make it very clear
甘迺迪先生通過了政府道德辦公室程序，
that Mr. Kennedy has gone through the same Office of Government Ethics process
如同本年度和前幾屆政府財務委員會中所有其他提名人一樣，
as every single other nominee in the Finance Committee this year and in previous
administrations.
除了列出他的資產，
In addition to listing his assets
包括你提出的項目，
including the items that you've identified
他簽署了一封經政府道德辦公室審核的道德信。
he has signed an ethics letter that has been reviewed by the Office of Government Ethics,
列出基於職能和擬議職責可能引致的利益衝突，
concerning any possible conflict in light of its functions and the nominee's proposed duties.
我們有一封來自政府道德辦公室的信件，
And we have a letter from the Office of Government Ethics
表明他完全遵守了所有關於利益衝突的法律和法規。
that he has complied completely with all applicable laws and regulations governing conflicts of interest.
主席先生，我要提出一個資訊點，
Mr. Chairman, point of information here
我們是否有一個提名人，
have we had a single nominee come through,
通過起訴其將要監管的實體而獲得250 萬美元，
who's made $2.5 million off suing one of the entities that it would be regulating
並計劃在未來繼續從每項訴訟中分一杯羹？
and plans to keep getting a take of every lawsuit in the future?
我們以前可有先例？
Have we had that before?
我沒有審查過所有其他提名人財務利益的過去文件。
I haven't reviewed the past documentation of
every other nominee's financial interests
所以沒有。
and so no.
但我知道每次有提名人出現，
But I know that every single time we get a nominee
他們的財務利益都會受到質疑，
their financial interests are attacked.
因此我們有政府道德辦公室，
That's why we have the Office of Government Ethics.
因此他們審查了他記錄中的所有內容，
That's why they've reviewed everything that's in his record
我認為他甚至因此。
and that's why he has even — I think,
我不知道是否該要求他談論這個，
and I don't know that I want to ask him to get into it
但他已經列出了自己的資產，
but he has listed his assets
並已按照我們的道德法律討論了責任，
and has gone through a discussion of the responsibilities under our ethics laws
並遵守了所有相關要求。
and is complied with all of those requirements.
蒂利斯參議員。
Senator Tillis.
謝謝主席先生。
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
片段中，Elizabeth Warren 並非質詢，而是照讀醫藥公司的講稿。
目的，就是將小羅拔‧甘迺迪塑造成一個，
為了賺錢，不惜犧牲無辜兒童性命的人。
但美國人顯然已經不再信任這些參議員，
因為許多美國家庭，已深受疫苗禍害。
因此，YouTube 留言中，大多數人指責她收受醫藥公司捐款，
批評她是偽君子、說謊等等。
留言亦為小羅拔‧甘迺迪辯護，
因為控告藥廠勝訴而收取的律師費，並不代表他貪污。
相反，收受醫藥公司捐款，成為他們的打手，
背離美國人民的利益，這才是貪污。
同樣，聽證會後，人們湧入她的X 平台，對她口誅筆伐。
顯然，美國人民已經厭倦為大財團服務的政客，他們不但為大財團護航，
更重要的是，協助醫藥集團繼續殘害美國人的生命。
於這裡，我們可以看到，一個好撒馬利亞人所面對的困境，
以及，他如何被既得利益者迫害。
即使小羅拔‧甘迺迪和特朗普能夠成功力挽狂瀾，
全面審視疫苗的安全性，甚或停止疫苗接種，也只算是亡羊補牢。
因為現在的吹角，對已經接種疫苗的人來說已經太遲。
許多人已經因疫苗而死，而剩下來的人，傷害亦已經造成，
他們再也無法回到接種疫苗前。
然而，錫安早在29 年前已經吹角，
不單弟兄姊妹於這幾十年間得著保守，
甚至他們下一代的小獅子，都可以作出正確的選擇。
除了疫苗，錫安於這幾十年間，分享了各式各樣的健康資訊，
這些資訊，同樣是Oracle 級數的信息。
讓弟兄姊妹在這幾十年間，有著健康的身體。
於人生中擁有更多可能性，可以完成更多夢想。
即使是這些年間離世的弟兄姊妹，
其實，亦因著過往的健康信息延長了壽命，
這才是一個真正的好撒馬利亞人，會為別人做的事。
然而，我們環顧香港其他教會，
是否有人願意成為好撒馬利亞人，為陌生人捨命呢？答案，當然是沒有。
他們甚至沒有達到小羅拔‧甘迺迪的程度。
顯然，上星期e-song 新歌，ZNSE 1832【A Drop of Kindness】，
講述好撒馬利亞人的故事，其實亦是Walking Oracle，
指向小羅拔‧甘迺迪
原因，【A Drop of Kindness】一曲，
題材選自發生於錫安裡的好撒馬利亞人的故事。
填詞方面，早於2023 年12 月開始，2024 年5 月完成。
其後，一直排期到2024 年11 月，才開始預備編曲，
到了2024 年12 月，開始製作MV，包括訪問MV 裡的幾位主人翁。
再加上後期製作，最終，到2025 年1 月26 日才正式首播。
由填詞到播出，經歷了一年多的時間，因此，絕對是神一日不偏差的帶領。
並且，遇上小羅拔‧甘迺迪的聽證會，證明【A Drop of Kindness】一曲，
好撒馬利亞人的題目，絕對是Oracle 級數，是神所欣賞。
並且，世界是絕對圍繞著錫安而轉動。
因為，當首播後，全美國的聚焦點，不再是加州大火，
而是小羅拔‧甘迺迪出席衛生部長提名聽證會。
連續兩天的聽證會，讓他成為了全美國的焦點。
甚至乎，聽證會後，大量美國人湧到他X 平台的社交媒體鼓勵他。
讓所有美國人見證一個，神以e-song 作為Walking Oracle 認可，
好撒馬利亞人的例子。
再者，小羅拔‧甘迺迪的父親，羅拔‧甘迺迪被槍傷，
也是被送到好撒馬利亞人醫院搶救，這亦是一個共同信息。
其實，以他的家境和年紀，
大可不必接受特朗普的提名，擔任衛生部長一職，
也就無需於聽證會被參議員圍攻，更無需冒著往後被暗殺的風險。
然而，當他看到一代又一代的美國人，被醫藥利益集團如同強盜般，
搶劫他們的金錢，又打傷他們，摧殘他們的健康時，
一個好撒馬利亞人，就會挺身而出，救助和醫治這些受傷的人。
YouTube 片段：
我國存在嚴重的健康問題，我們必須誠實地正視，
We have massive health problems in our country that we must face honestly.
過去20 年，我每天早上做的第一件事就是祈禱神，
And the first thing I've done every morning for the past 20 years is to pray to God that.
讓祂把我放在一個位置，
He would put me in a position
可以終結慢性病流行，並保護我們的孩子。
where I can end the chronic disease epidemic and protect our children.
因此，我十分感激特朗普總統讓我今天有機會坐在你們面前，
That's why I'm so grateful to President Trump for the opportunity
to sit here before you today
尋求你們的支持和合作來完成這項工作。
and seek your support and your partnership in this endeavor.
作出總結時，主席先生，我要向你、各位委員、總統，
I'll conclude with a promise to you, Mr. Chairman, members of this committee, to the President
以及最重要的是美國數千萬位父母，特別是母親們作出承諾，
and most of all to the tens of millions of parents across America, especially the moms,
正是她們將這個議題推到舞台中心，
who have propelled this issue to the centerstage.
如果我有幸獲得任命，
Should I be so privileged as to be confirmed.
我們會確保稅金用於支持健康食品，
We will make sure our tax dollars support healthy foods.
我們會嚴格審查食物供應中的化學添加劑，
We will scrutinize the chemical additives to our food supply.
我們會消除各機構的財務利益衝突。
We'll remove the financial conflicts of interest from the agencies.
我們將建立一個誠實、公正、以科學為導向的美國衛生及公共服務部，
We'll create an honest, unbiased, science-driven HHS.
對總統、國會和美國人民負責，
Accountable to the President, to the Congress and to the American people.
我們會逆轉慢性病流行，讓美國重返健康之路。
We will reverse the chronic disease epidemic and
put the nation back on the road to good health.
Ref：錫安日報 2012 榮耀盼望 vol. 782 (20250202)
沒有留言:
張貼留言